Psychosocial Adversity and Health Service Utilization Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Stimulants: A Latent Class Analysis

Purpose: This study sought to identify latent classes of psychosocial adversity among men who have sex with men (MSM) who use stimulants, examine sociodemographic correlates of class membership, and assess differences in health service utilization across classes. Methods: This secondary analysis used baseline data from 205 MSM who use stimulants in Boston, Massachusetts, and Miami, Florida (March 2018–March 2024). Latent class analysis was applied to identify patterns of psychosocial adversity based on childhood sexual abuse (CSA), four forms of interpersonal violence (IPV), and three types of sexual minority stress. Sociodemographic characteristics included age, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Outcomes were binary (any/none) indicators of mental health care, substance use care, emergency department (ED) encounters, and inpatient admissions in the past 4 months. Results: A three-class solution was selected: Low Psychosocial Adversity ( n = 107; 52.2%), Past-Year IPV-sexual orientation discrimination (SOD; n = 56; 27.3%), and Prior IPV-CSA ( n = 42; 20.5%). Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher odds of membership in the Past-Year IPV-SOD class compared with the Low Psychosocial Adversity class (odds ratio = 2.30; 95% confidence interval = 1.04–5.23, P = 0.046). In exploratory pairwise comparisons, participants in the Prior IPV-CSA class had a higher prevalence of any ED encounters (47.6%) than those in the Low Psychosocial Adversity class (28.1%; χ 2 [1,204] = 4.44; P = 0.035). Conclusion: Among MSM who use stimulants, configurations of psychosocial adversity varied by sociodemographic context, with socioeconomic status distinguishing patterns of adversity, and showed limited differentiation in health service utilization. These findings underscore the role of structural conditions and support syndemic-informed, person-centered approaches to inform more equitable prevention and service strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LGBT Health
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23258292261444749
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial Adversity and Health Service Utilization Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Stimulants: A Latent Class Analysis

David W. Pantalone, Daniel Mayo, Katie B. Biello, M Mimiaga et al.
LGBT Health
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

Psychosocial Adversity and Health Service Utilization Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Stimulants: A Latent Class Analysis

David W. Pantalone, Daniel Mayo, Katie B. Biello, M Mimiaga, Kenneth H. Mayer, Steven A. Safren
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to identify latent classes of psychosocial adversity among men who have sex with men (MSM) who use stimulants, examine sociodemographic correlates of class membership, and assess differences in health service utilization across classes. Methods: This secondary analysis used baseline data from 205 MSM who use stimulants in Boston, Massachusetts, and Miami, Florida (March 2018–March 2024). Latent class analysis was applied to identify patterns of psychosocial adversity based on childhood sexual abuse (CSA), four forms of interpersonal violence (IPV), and three types of sexual minority stress. Sociodemographic characteristics included age, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Outcomes were binary (any/none) indicators of mental health care, substance use care, emergency department (ED) encounters, and inpatient admissions in the past 4 months. Results: A three-class solution was selected: Low Psychosocial Adversity ( n = 107; 52.2%), Past-Year IPV-sexual orientation discrimination (SOD; n = 56; 27.3%), and Prior IPV-CSA ( n = 42; 20.5%). Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher odds of membership in the Past-Year IPV-SOD class compared with the Low Psychosocial Adversity class (odds ratio = 2.30; 95% confidence interval = 1.04–5.23, P = 0.046). In exploratory pairwise comparisons, participants in the Prior IPV-CSA class had a higher prevalence of any ED encounters (47.6%) than those in the Low Psychosocial Adversity class (28.1%; χ 2 [1,204] = 4.44; P = 0.035). Conclusion: Among MSM who use stimulants, configurations of psychosocial adversity varied by sociodemographic context, with socioeconomic status distinguishing patterns of adversity, and showed limited differentiation in health service utilization. These findings underscore the role of structural conditions and support syndemic-informed, person-centered approaches to inform more equitable prevention and service strategies.

LGBT Health
Boston University (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Brown University (US), Los Angeles LGBT Center (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Fenway Health (US)
National Institutes of Health
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.