A variational framework for the complexity of PDE solutions

Abstract Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are fundamental mathematical models for describing physical phenomena, yet most PDEs of practical interest cannot be solved analytically and require numerical approximations. The feasibility of such numerical methods, however, is ultimately constrained by the limitations of existing computational models. Since digital computers constitute the primary physical realizations of numerical computations, and Turing machines define their theoretical limits, the question of Turing computability of PDE solutions arises as a problem of fundamental theoretical significance. The Turing computability of PDE solutions provides a rigorous framework to distinguish equations that are, in principle, effectively solvable from those that inherently encode undecidable or non-computable behavior. Once computability has been established, complexity theory extends the analysis by quantifying the computational resources required to approximate the corresponding PDE solutions. In this work, we present a novel framework based on least-squares variational formulations and their associated gradient flows to analyze the computability and complexity of PDE solutions from an optimization perspective. Our approach enables the approximation of PDE solution operators via discrete gradient flows, linking structural properties of the PDE, such as coercivity, ellipticity, and convexity, to the complexity of their solutions. Within this setting, we characterize representation- and discretization-dependent sufficient conditions for regimes where PDEs admit effective, polynomial-time numerical approximations, as well as those exhibiting complexity blowup, where the input data possess polynomial-time complexity, yet the solution itself scales super-polynomially. In summary, this paper develops a general variational framework for analyzing the computability and computational complexity of classes of PDE solutions. The results provide insights into how structural properties of the underlying PDE and the regularity of the solutions influence its complexity, by establishing sufficient conditions for computability and complexity bounds. Beyond the theoretical characterization, the framework provides principled guidelines for the design of effective numerical methods and contributes to the understanding of the fundamental limitations of digital computation for PDE problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BIT Numerical Mathematics
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-026-01137-5
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A variational framework for the complexity of PDE solutions

Holger Boche, Juan Esteban Suarez Cardona, Gitta Kutyniok
BIT Numerical Mathematics
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

A variational framework for the complexity of PDE solutions

Holger Boche, Juan Esteban Suarez Cardona, Gitta Kutyniok
article en

Abstract

Abstract Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are fundamental mathematical models for describing physical phenomena, yet most PDEs of practical interest cannot be solved analytically and require numerical approximations. The feasibility of such numerical methods, however, is ultimately constrained by the limitations of existing computational models. Since digital computers constitute the primary physical realizations of numerical computations, and Turing machines define their theoretical limits, the question of Turing computability of PDE solutions arises as a problem of fundamental theoretical significance. The Turing computability of PDE solutions provides a rigorous framework to distinguish equations that are, in principle, effectively solvable from those that inherently encode undecidable or non-computable behavior. Once computability has been established, complexity theory extends the analysis by quantifying the computational resources required to approximate the corresponding PDE solutions. In this work, we present a novel framework based on least-squares variational formulations and their associated gradient flows to analyze the computability and complexity of PDE solutions from an optimization perspective. Our approach enables the approximation of PDE solution operators via discrete gradient flows, linking structural properties of the PDE, such as coercivity, ellipticity, and convexity, to the complexity of their solutions. Within this setting, we characterize representation- and discretization-dependent sufficient conditions for regimes where PDEs admit effective, polynomial-time numerical approximations, as well as those exhibiting complexity blowup, where the input data possess polynomial-time complexity, yet the solution itself scales super-polynomially. In summary, this paper develops a general variational framework for analyzing the computability and computational complexity of classes of PDE solutions. The results provide insights into how structural properties of the underlying PDE and the regularity of the solutions influence its complexity, by establishing sufficient conditions for computability and complexity bounds. Beyond the theoretical characterization, the framework provides principled guidelines for the design of effective numerical methods and contributes to the understanding of the fundamental limitations of digital computation for PDE problems.

BIT Numerical MathematicsVol. 66(3)
Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE), Munich Center for Machine Learning, Technical University of Munich (DE), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.