PFUSRC-047 Paths Are Not Stochastic Competition The Estimation-Avoidance-Selection Anchoring Mechanism Ontological Limitations of Feynman Path Integrals and the Unified Meta-Framework of the Global Path Formula

The Feynman path integral is a foundational mathematical tool in quantum mechanics. Its popular interpretation often portrays microscopic processes as “particles traversing all possible paths simultaneously, with paths canceling one another until only one remains.” This paper argues that the path integral itself carries no ontological commitment; the issue lies in the popular interpretation that mistakes mathematical equivalence for physical reality, implicitly assuming an ontology of stochastic competition and passive cancellation. Drawing on the PFUSRC biconic ontology, this paper demonstrates that no continuous paths exist at the ontological layer; only discrete \Psi-\Xi anchoring events are present. The actual microscopic process is an ordered anchoring sequence of Estimation → Avoidance → Selection, wherein the \Xi-field performs proactive topological risk avoidance rather than passive behavior. A fourfold logical falsification of the “stochastic competition / passive cancellation” hypothesis is presented, addressing energy dissipation, entropy increase, irreconcilable phase and spin topologies, and time delay. The 720^\circ spin recovery property serves as a key empirical anchor, revealing the topologically entangled nature of microscopic particles. From a dimensional-geometric perspective, this paper further demonstrates that fundamental physical equations — the Lagrangian, the Feynman path integral, the Dirac equation, and the Einstein field equations — are all three-dimensional cross-sectional approximations of the four-dimensional biconic ontological topology, inherently discarding the degrees of freedom of the Gap Field, the \Psi/\Xi dual-field screening mechanism, and four-dimensional topological temporal ordering. Accordingly, this paper proposes the Global Path Formula as a unified ontological meta-framework. This framework is not a single computational equation; its core function is to delineate the domains of applicability, the missing degrees of freedom, and the hierarchical positioning of all classical, quantum, and gravitational physical equations. It also subsumes the scattered phenomenological corrections in contemporary frontier physics under a unified global correction logic grounded in four-dimensional ontological topology. This paper accomplishes an ontological reinterpretation of the quantum path problem and provides a unified foundational classificatory paradigm for all fundamental physical equations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20715204
Primary Topic
International Science and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PFUSRC-047 Paths Are Not Stochastic Competition The Estimation-Avoidance-Selection Anchoring Mechanism Ontological Limitations of Feynman Path Integrals and the Unified Meta-Framework of the Global Path Formula

Zhenmin Wang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Science and Diplomacy
article

PFUSRC-047 Paths Are Not Stochastic Competition The Estimation-Avoidance-Selection Anchoring Mechanism Ontological Limitations of Feynman Path Integrals and the Unified Meta-Framework of the Global Path Formula

Zhenmin Wang
article en

Abstract

The Feynman path integral is a foundational mathematical tool in quantum mechanics. Its popular interpretation often portrays microscopic processes as “particles traversing all possible paths simultaneously, with paths canceling one another until only one remains.” This paper argues that the path integral itself carries no ontological commitment; the issue lies in the popular interpretation that mistakes mathematical equivalence for physical reality, implicitly assuming an ontology of stochastic competition and passive cancellation. Drawing on the PFUSRC biconic ontology, this paper demonstrates that no continuous paths exist at the ontological layer; only discrete \Psi-\Xi anchoring events are present. The actual microscopic process is an ordered anchoring sequence of Estimation → Avoidance → Selection, wherein the \Xi-field performs proactive topological risk avoidance rather than passive behavior. A fourfold logical falsification of the “stochastic competition / passive cancellation” hypothesis is presented, addressing energy dissipation, entropy increase, irreconcilable phase and spin topologies, and time delay. The 720^\circ spin recovery property serves as a key empirical anchor, revealing the topologically entangled nature of microscopic particles. From a dimensional-geometric perspective, this paper further demonstrates that fundamental physical equations — the Lagrangian, the Feynman path integral, the Dirac equation, and the Einstein field equations — are all three-dimensional cross-sectional approximations of the four-dimensional biconic ontological topology, inherently discarding the degrees of freedom of the Gap Field, the \Psi/\Xi dual-field screening mechanism, and four-dimensional topological temporal ordering. Accordingly, this paper proposes the Global Path Formula as a unified ontological meta-framework. This framework is not a single computational equation; its core function is to delineate the domains of applicability, the missing degrees of freedom, and the hierarchical positioning of all classical, quantum, and gravitational physical equations. It also subsumes the scattered phenomenological corrections in contemporary frontier physics under a unified global correction logic grounded in four-dimensional ontological topology. This paper accomplishes an ontological reinterpretation of the quantum path problem and provides a unified foundational classificatory paradigm for all fundamental physical equations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Science and Diplomacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.