Beyond Low Trust: Synthesizing a Systemic Model for the Distrust Trap in Public Administration

The distrust trap is a critical and self-reinforcing dysfunction that undermines the effectiveness of public administration. Despite growing academic interest, scholarly knowledge remains fragmented, with studies focusing partially on the causes, mechanisms, or consequences of the phenomenon. This study addresses this gap by synthesizing international literature to develop a unified, multi-level conceptual framework. Leveraging a narrative literature review methodology and organizing findings through the thematic analysis of 91 academic articles, the research identifies the central patterns and causal relationships that govern the distrust trap. The findings lead to the development of the “Systemic Entrapment Model,” which is structured across three interconnected levels: Foundational Drivers, Reinforcing Dynamics, and Behavioral Manifestations. The proposed model makes a theoretical contribution by integrating psychological and structural explanations into a cohesive system. Practically, it offers a conceptual diagnostic framework for policymakers, capable of supporting the distinction between symptoms and the deeper causes of the dysfunction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Administration
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2026.2682568
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Low Trust: Synthesizing a Systemic Model for the Distrust Trap in Public Administration

Panagiotis Tsarouhas, Konstantinos Grigoriadis
International Journal of Public Administration
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Beyond Low Trust: Synthesizing a Systemic Model for the Distrust Trap in Public Administration

Panagiotis Tsarouhas, Konstantinos Grigoriadis
article en

Abstract

The distrust trap is a critical and self-reinforcing dysfunction that undermines the effectiveness of public administration. Despite growing academic interest, scholarly knowledge remains fragmented, with studies focusing partially on the causes, mechanisms, or consequences of the phenomenon. This study addresses this gap by synthesizing international literature to develop a unified, multi-level conceptual framework. Leveraging a narrative literature review methodology and organizing findings through the thematic analysis of 91 academic articles, the research identifies the central patterns and causal relationships that govern the distrust trap. The findings lead to the development of the “Systemic Entrapment Model,” which is structured across three interconnected levels: Foundational Drivers, Reinforcing Dynamics, and Behavioral Manifestations. The proposed model makes a theoretical contribution by integrating psychological and structural explanations into a cohesive system. Practically, it offers a conceptual diagnostic framework for policymakers, capable of supporting the distinction between symptoms and the deeper causes of the dysfunction.

International Journal of Public Administration
University of Thessaly (GR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.