Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer in a patient with pharyngoesophageal stenosis

Video 1 Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection in superficial esophageal cancer. Download Video Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for the treatment of superficial esophageal cancers in Japan, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is commonly reserved for small lesions. Conventional EMR techniques, including cap-assisted EMR or the two-channel method, require dedicated accessories.[ 1​ ] [ ​2​ ] In contrast, gel-immersion EMR (GI-EMR) can be performed without distal attachment; the procedure has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in the treatment of gastric and duodenal tumors.[ 3​ ] [ ​4​ ] However, its use for superficial esophageal cancer, particularly in patients with pharyngoesophageal stenosis, has not been reported. A 71-year-old man with a history of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for pharyngeal cancer and ESD for esophageal cancer underwent follow-up endoscopy, which revealed a 10-mm type 0-IIa lesion in the mid-thoracic esophagus, considered to be limited to the epithelium and lamina propria mucosa and deemed suitable for endoscopic resection. ESD was attempted but discontinued because the endoscope with a distal attachment could not be advanced due to post-CRT pharyngeal stenosis. Therefore, GI-EMR was performed ( Video 1 ). An EG-840TP endoscope (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) with an outer diameter of 7.9 mm—the largest endoscope that can pass through the stricture—was used. After marking ([ Fig. 1a ]), gel injection created a clear working space. Following submucosal injection, en bloc resection was performed using a snare ([ Fig. 1b and c ]). After resection, minor bleeding was noted and successfully controlled using Coagrasper (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The total procedure time from marking to hemostasis was 18 minutes. No adverse events were reported. Histopathology showed squamous cell carcinoma confined to the mucosa (pT1a), without lymphovascular invasion and with negative margins, indicative of curative resection ([ Fig. 1d ]). Fig. 1 Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection in superficial esophageal cancer. ( a ) Superficial esophageal cancer following iodine staining and marking. ( b ) Post-resection ulcer base. ( c ) A resected specimen. ( d ) Histopathological findings showing squamous cell carcinoma confined to the mucosa, with negative margins. This case demonstrates that GI-EMR may be a feasible alternative when a standard-diameter endoscope cannot be advanced and ESD or cap-assisted EMR is technically challenging. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG_3AC Publication History Received: 09 March 2026 Accepted after revision: 13 May 2026 Article published online: 16 June 2026 © 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2877-1961
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer in a patient with pharyngoesophageal stenosis

Yuji Urabe, Takahiro Uda, Hidehiko Takigawa, Toshio Kuwai et al.
Endoscopy
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer in a patient with pharyngoesophageal stenosis

Yuji Urabe, Takahiro Uda, Hidehiko Takigawa, Toshio Kuwai, Yuichi Hiyama, Tomoyuki Gurita, S Oka
article en

Abstract

Video 1 Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection in superficial esophageal cancer. Download Video Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for the treatment of superficial esophageal cancers in Japan, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is commonly reserved for small lesions. Conventional EMR techniques, including cap-assisted EMR or the two-channel method, require dedicated accessories.[ 1​ ] [ ​2​ ] In contrast, gel-immersion EMR (GI-EMR) can be performed without distal attachment; the procedure has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in the treatment of gastric and duodenal tumors.[ 3​ ] [ ​4​ ] However, its use for superficial esophageal cancer, particularly in patients with pharyngoesophageal stenosis, has not been reported. A 71-year-old man with a history of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for pharyngeal cancer and ESD for esophageal cancer underwent follow-up endoscopy, which revealed a 10-mm type 0-IIa lesion in the mid-thoracic esophagus, considered to be limited to the epithelium and lamina propria mucosa and deemed suitable for endoscopic resection. ESD was attempted but discontinued because the endoscope with a distal attachment could not be advanced due to post-CRT pharyngeal stenosis. Therefore, GI-EMR was performed ( Video 1 ). An EG-840TP endoscope (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) with an outer diameter of 7.9 mm—the largest endoscope that can pass through the stricture—was used. After marking ([ Fig. 1a ]), gel injection created a clear working space. Following submucosal injection, en bloc resection was performed using a snare ([ Fig. 1b and c ]). After resection, minor bleeding was noted and successfully controlled using Coagrasper (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The total procedure time from marking to hemostasis was 18 minutes. No adverse events were reported. Histopathology showed squamous cell carcinoma confined to the mucosa (pT1a), without lymphovascular invasion and with negative margins, indicative of curative resection ([ Fig. 1d ]). Fig. 1 Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection in superficial esophageal cancer. ( a ) Superficial esophageal cancer following iodine staining and marking. ( b ) Post-resection ulcer base. ( c ) A resected specimen. ( d ) Histopathological findings showing squamous cell carcinoma confined to the mucosa, with negative margins. This case demonstrates that GI-EMR may be a feasible alternative when a standard-diameter endoscope cannot be advanced and ESD or cap-assisted EMR is technically challenging. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG_3AC Publication History Received: 09 March 2026 Accepted after revision: 13 May 2026 Article published online: 16 June 2026 © 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Endoscopy
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (US), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.