Systemic Immune–Inflammation Index (SII) as a Predictive Biomarker of Therapeutic Response in Psoriasis: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Anti-TNF, Anti-IL-17, and Anti-IL-23 Agents

Background/Objectives: The Systemic Immune–Inflammation Index (SII), derived from routine blood counts, has emerged as a potential marker of systemic inflammation in psoriasis. However, its longitudinal behavior across different systemic and biologic therapies remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to evaluate changes in SII over time, assess its relationship with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and compare SII trajectories among different treatment classes. Methods: A retrospective single-center study included 210 adults with psoriasis treated for 12 months with cyclosporine, anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-17, or anti-IL-23 agents. SII and PASI were recorded at baseline, 16, 36, and 52 weeks. Correlations between SII and PASI were assessed using Spearman’s analysis. Longitudinal changes were evaluated using the Friedman test, and treatment-group differences were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis analysis. An adjusted multivariable linear regression model including age, sex, body mass index, psoriatic arthritis, baseline PASI, and treatment group was performed to identify factors associated with Δ%SII. Results: SII correlated with PASI at baseline (ρ = 0.406, p < 0.001) and at 52 weeks (ρ = 0.186, p = 0.007), whereas no significant associations were observed at intermediate timepoints. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated significant differences in SII trajectories among treatment groups (p < 0.001). SII increased over time in the cyclosporine and anti-TNF-α groups, while anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 therapies were associated with marked and sustained reductions. In the adjusted model, anti-IL-17 (β = −90.7, 95% CI −119.6 to −61.8, p < 0.001) and anti-IL-23 therapies (β = −97.9, 95% CI −126.2 to −69.6, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with greater reductions in SII compared with cyclosporine, whereas anti-TNF therapy showed no significant difference. Conclusions: SII is a dynamic marker of systemic inflammatory changes in psoriasis and exhibits distinct longitudinal patterns according to treatment class. The pronounced reductions observed with IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors support the potential value of SII as an adjunctive measure of systemic inflammation. However, prospective studies are required to clarify its clinical utility and determine its role in routine patient management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16060323
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic Immune–Inflammation Index (SII) as a Predictive Biomarker of Therapeutic Response in Psoriasis: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Anti-TNF, Anti-IL-17, and Anti-IL-23 Agents

Emanuele Trovato, Francesca La Marca, Martina Dragotto, Alessandra Cartocci et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Systemic Immune–Inflammation Index (SII) as a Predictive Biomarker of Therapeutic Response in Psoriasis: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Anti-TNF, Anti-IL-17, and Anti-IL-23 Agents

Emanuele Trovato, Francesca La Marca, Martina Dragotto, Alessandra Cartocci, Pietro Rubegni, E. Calandra, Benedetta Simonini, Francesca Lussana
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Systemic Immune–Inflammation Index (SII), derived from routine blood counts, has emerged as a potential marker of systemic inflammation in psoriasis. However, its longitudinal behavior across different systemic and biologic therapies remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to evaluate changes in SII over time, assess its relationship with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and compare SII trajectories among different treatment classes. Methods: A retrospective single-center study included 210 adults with psoriasis treated for 12 months with cyclosporine, anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-17, or anti-IL-23 agents. SII and PASI were recorded at baseline, 16, 36, and 52 weeks. Correlations between SII and PASI were assessed using Spearman’s analysis. Longitudinal changes were evaluated using the Friedman test, and treatment-group differences were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis analysis. An adjusted multivariable linear regression model including age, sex, body mass index, psoriatic arthritis, baseline PASI, and treatment group was performed to identify factors associated with Δ%SII. Results: SII correlated with PASI at baseline (ρ = 0.406, p < 0.001) and at 52 weeks (ρ = 0.186, p = 0.007), whereas no significant associations were observed at intermediate timepoints. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated significant differences in SII trajectories among treatment groups (p < 0.001). SII increased over time in the cyclosporine and anti-TNF-α groups, while anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 therapies were associated with marked and sustained reductions. In the adjusted model, anti-IL-17 (β = −90.7, 95% CI −119.6 to −61.8, p < 0.001) and anti-IL-23 therapies (β = −97.9, 95% CI −126.2 to −69.6, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with greater reductions in SII compared with cyclosporine, whereas anti-TNF therapy showed no significant difference. Conclusions: SII is a dynamic marker of systemic inflammatory changes in psoriasis and exhibits distinct longitudinal patterns according to treatment class. The pronounced reductions observed with IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors support the potential value of SII as an adjunctive measure of systemic inflammation. However, prospective studies are required to clarify its clinical utility and determine its role in routine patient management.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(6)
University of Siena (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.