Final analysis of phase 2 clinical trial of ruxolitinib and azacitidine combination therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) overlap syndromes are characterized by the presence of features of both MDS and MPN and have a poor prognosis. We conducted a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the combination of Azacitidine (AZA) and Ruxolitinib (RUX) in MDS/MPN, with interim analysis showing an objective response rate of 57%. Herein, we report the final analysis from this clinical trial, including long-term survival data. METHODS: on days 1-5 was added starting cycle 4. Primary endpoint was objective response rate per the 2015 International Consortium Proposal (ICP) MDS/MPN response criteria. RESULTS: From 5/2013 to 8/2022, 52 patients were treated with a median age of 68 years (range, 39-82). Disease subtypes were MDS/MPN-Unclassifiable in 24 patients (46%), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in 23 patients (44%), and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia in 5 patients (10%). Majority of patients (n = 40, 77%) had intermediate-2/high-risk disease by Dynamic International Prognosis Scoring System criteria. Objective responses were attained in 30 patients (58%), with a median duration of response of 13.6 months (95% CI: 6.4-41.1). After a median follow up of 88.5 months, 13 (25%) patients are alive, with median overall survival (OS) of 26.7 months (95% CI: 16.5-52.7), 5-year OS 33%. Median OS in MDS/MPN-U and CMML was 52.7 months (5-year OS 46%) and 17.5 months (5-year OS 27%), respectively. Twelve patients (23%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation; with median OS not reached, 5-year OS 51%. Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 13 patients (25%). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) regardless of attribution were anemia (31, 60%), thrombocytopenia (27, 52%) and pneumonia (17, 33%). AE-related treatment discontinuation occurred in only 3 patients (6%). CONCLUSIONS: AZA-RUX therapy led to durable responses and encouraging OS in MDS/MPN with a manageable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01787487, (clinicaltrials.gov, date: 2/6/2013).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-026-01813-7
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Final analysis of phase 2 clinical trial of ruxolitinib and azacitidine combination therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms

Prithviraj Bose, Sankalp Arora, Koichi Takahashi, Sanam Loghavi et al.
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Final analysis of phase 2 clinical trial of ruxolitinib and azacitidine combination therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms

Prithviraj Bose, Sankalp Arora, Koichi Takahashi, Sanam Loghavi, Gautam Borthakur, Tapan Kadia, Jayastu Senapati, Lucia Masárová, Naveen Pemmaraju, Xuemei Wang, Lingsha Zhou, Habiba Halim, Graciela Nogueras González, Yesid Alvarado, Nicholas J. Short, Guillermo Montalban-Bravo, Naval G. Daver, Courtney D. DiNardo, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Elias Jabbour, Indraneel Deshmukh, Maro Ohanian, Dyana Saenz, Farhad Ravandi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) overlap syndromes are characterized by the presence of features of both MDS and MPN and have a poor prognosis. We conducted a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the combination of Azacitidine (AZA) and Ruxolitinib (RUX) in MDS/MPN, with interim analysis showing an objective response rate of 57%. Herein, we report the final analysis from this clinical trial, including long-term survival data. METHODS: on days 1-5 was added starting cycle 4. Primary endpoint was objective response rate per the 2015 International Consortium Proposal (ICP) MDS/MPN response criteria. RESULTS: From 5/2013 to 8/2022, 52 patients were treated with a median age of 68 years (range, 39-82). Disease subtypes were MDS/MPN-Unclassifiable in 24 patients (46%), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in 23 patients (44%), and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia in 5 patients (10%). Majority of patients (n = 40, 77%) had intermediate-2/high-risk disease by Dynamic International Prognosis Scoring System criteria. Objective responses were attained in 30 patients (58%), with a median duration of response of 13.6 months (95% CI: 6.4-41.1). After a median follow up of 88.5 months, 13 (25%) patients are alive, with median overall survival (OS) of 26.7 months (95% CI: 16.5-52.7), 5-year OS 33%. Median OS in MDS/MPN-U and CMML was 52.7 months (5-year OS 46%) and 17.5 months (5-year OS 27%), respectively. Twelve patients (23%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation; with median OS not reached, 5-year OS 51%. Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 13 patients (25%). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) regardless of attribution were anemia (31, 60%), thrombocytopenia (27, 52%) and pneumonia (17, 33%). AE-related treatment discontinuation occurred in only 3 patients (6%). CONCLUSIONS: AZA-RUX therapy led to durable responses and encouraging OS in MDS/MPN with a manageable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01787487, (clinicaltrials.gov, date: 2/6/2013).

Journal of Hematology & Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.