Structural power redux: geoeconomic rivalry in a networked world

The US and China are locked in a spiralling geopolitical competition to renegotiate globalization. This competition centres on establishing control over the transnational financial, infrastructure, digital and production networks that have taken shape after the Cold War. We historicize how US structural power became ‘networked’ in the neoliberal era, and theorize how these networks shape current superpower competition. We contend that contemporary structural power flows from the integration of transnational networks. Infrastructure is paramount within US and Chinese global strategies, but it is increasingly bundled with investments in digital and production networks, supported by exclusionary financing. We introduce two examples of ‘network bundling’. China fuses Sino-centric port infrastructure and digital networks by expanding the use of LOGINK. Along the Lobito Corridor, the US steers infrastructure investments in attempts to reconfigure critical minerals value chains. Through bundling, superpowers aspire to leverage power across networks and to lock third countries into new dependencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2026.2675839
Primary Topic
Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural power redux: geoeconomic rivalry in a networked world

Steve Rolf, Tim Zajontz, Seth Schindler
Globalizations
Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
article

Structural power redux: geoeconomic rivalry in a networked world

Steve Rolf, Tim Zajontz, Seth Schindler
article en

Abstract

The US and China are locked in a spiralling geopolitical competition to renegotiate globalization. This competition centres on establishing control over the transnational financial, infrastructure, digital and production networks that have taken shape after the Cold War. We historicize how US structural power became ‘networked’ in the neoliberal era, and theorize how these networks shape current superpower competition. We contend that contemporary structural power flows from the integration of transnational networks. Infrastructure is paramount within US and Chinese global strategies, but it is increasingly bundled with investments in digital and production networks, supported by exclusionary financing. We introduce two examples of ‘network bundling’. China fuses Sino-centric port infrastructure and digital networks by expanding the use of LOGINK. Along the Lobito Corridor, the US steers infrastructure investments in attempts to reconfigure critical minerals value chains. Through bundling, superpowers aspire to leverage power across networks and to lock third countries into new dependencies.

Globalizations
University of Freiburg (DE), University of Sussex (GB), Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of Manchester (GB)
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.