Evolving attitudes towards cancer screening: a 2024 update of UK population views

BACKGROUND: This study assessed current population views about cancer screening in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, screening programme changes and new technological advances. METHODS: 18 years), recruited via the online platform, Prolific, completed a questionnaire about their views on cancer screening, using eight questions from a 2012 survey (weighted for age and sex, n = 603). We summarised participants' views, explored associations with participant characteristics using logistic regression and compared 2024 and 2012 responses using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Public enthusiasm for cancer screening in the UK remained high with 93% believing routine screening is almost always beneficial, supported by strong beliefs that finding cancer early means treatment saves lives. Awareness of slow-growing cancers was modest at 51% but has increased since 2012. Nevertheless, most participants still wanted testing for slow-growing and untreatable cancer. Some believed they had received too few screening tests, particularly men, people from ethnic minority backgrounds and those with higher educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that public appetite for screening persists even as awareness of slow-growing cancers increases, reflecting not only possible knowledge gaps but also trust, values and optimism about future treatments. Future research should explore these factors to support truly informed screening decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03505-y
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolving attitudes towards cancer screening: a 2024 update of UK population views

Jo Waller, Juliet A. Usher‐Smith, Efthalia Massou, Rebecca A. Dennison et al.
British Journal of Cancer
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Evolving attitudes towards cancer screening: a 2024 update of UK population views

Jo Waller, Juliet A. Usher‐Smith, Efthalia Massou, Rebecca A. Dennison, Faye C. Dannhauser
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed current population views about cancer screening in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, screening programme changes and new technological advances. METHODS: 18 years), recruited via the online platform, Prolific, completed a questionnaire about their views on cancer screening, using eight questions from a 2012 survey (weighted for age and sex, n = 603). We summarised participants' views, explored associations with participant characteristics using logistic regression and compared 2024 and 2012 responses using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Public enthusiasm for cancer screening in the UK remained high with 93% believing routine screening is almost always beneficial, supported by strong beliefs that finding cancer early means treatment saves lives. Awareness of slow-growing cancers was modest at 51% but has increased since 2012. Nevertheless, most participants still wanted testing for slow-growing and untreatable cancer. Some believed they had received too few screening tests, particularly men, people from ethnic minority backgrounds and those with higher educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that public appetite for screening persists even as awareness of slow-growing cancers increases, reflecting not only possible knowledge gaps but also trust, values and optimism about future treatments. Future research should explore these factors to support truly informed screening decisions.

British Journal of Cancer
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Primary Health Care (QA)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.