Reliability and Validity of the International Depression Questionnaire and International Anxiety Questionnaire in English- and Spanish-Speaking Samples in Chile, Mexico, and the United States

Given the high prevalence of depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) globally and their comorbidity, it is imperative to have reliable and valid measures of these constructs. The International Depression Questionnaire (IDQ) and International Anxiety Questionnaire (IAQ) are recently developed measures to assess for depressive disorder and GAD, respectively, based on ICD-11 criteria. The current study examined the reliability and validity of the IDQ and IAQ in English- and Spanish-language translations in four samples from Chile, Mexico, and the United States. The Spanish IDQ and IAQ demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency (IDQ omega = .87-.91 and IAQ omega = .86-.93) and strong convergent validity. Overall prevalence for ICD-11 depressive disorder was 15.3%, and the GAD prevalence was 22.4% across samples. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) found good to excellent fit across the four samples, supporting the unidimensionality of the IDQ and IAQ. Results indicate the Spanish translations of the IDQ and IAQ are psychometrically sound and appear appropriate for use in North and South American samples of Spanish speakers. Results also supported the psychometric properties of the English IDQ and IAQ in the United States.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assessment
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261455671
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity of the International Depression Questionnaire and International Anxiety Questionnaire in English- and Spanish-Speaking Samples in Chile, Mexico, and the United States

Ruby Charak, Brianna M. Byllesby, Inés Cano-González, Andrés Fresno et al.
Assessment
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Reliability and Validity of the International Depression Questionnaire and International Anxiety Questionnaire in English- and Spanish-Speaking Samples in Chile, Mexico, and the United States

Ruby Charak, Brianna M. Byllesby, Inés Cano-González, Andrés Fresno, Román Ronzón-Tirado, Yuriria González Bonilla
article en

Abstract

Given the high prevalence of depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) globally and their comorbidity, it is imperative to have reliable and valid measures of these constructs. The International Depression Questionnaire (IDQ) and International Anxiety Questionnaire (IAQ) are recently developed measures to assess for depressive disorder and GAD, respectively, based on ICD-11 criteria. The current study examined the reliability and validity of the IDQ and IAQ in English- and Spanish-language translations in four samples from Chile, Mexico, and the United States. The Spanish IDQ and IAQ demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency (IDQ omega = .87-.91 and IAQ omega = .86-.93) and strong convergent validity. Overall prevalence for ICD-11 depressive disorder was 15.3%, and the GAD prevalence was 22.4% across samples. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) found good to excellent fit across the four samples, supporting the unidimensionality of the IDQ and IAQ. Results indicate the Spanish translations of the IDQ and IAQ are psychometrically sound and appear appropriate for use in North and South American samples of Spanish speakers. Results also supported the psychometric properties of the English IDQ and IAQ in the United States.

Assessment
University of Talca (CL), Universidad de Deusto (ES), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of South Dakota (US), Universidad de Xalapa (MX), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.