PFUSRC-048 Delayed-Choice Experiments Are Not Retroactive: Topological Reassignment of Uncompleted Four-Dimensional \Psi-\Xi Anchoring

The delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment (Kim et al., 1999) produced precise, reproducible data, yet mainstream physics remains trapped in a persistent explanatory crisis. Mainstream accounts invoke “post-selection,” “quantum entanglement,” and inequality formalisms such as V^2+K^2 \le 1, but consistently fail to answer one fundamental question: Why does the post-measurement choice exhibit strict one-to-one correlation with the pre-recorded detection outcomes? This paper argues that the root of the mainstream impasse lies in an unexamined ontological presupposition: that quantum systems are passive, structureless point particles. Based on the PFUSRC biconic ontology, this paper proposes that quantum systems possess a \Psi-\Xi dual ontological structure (Noetic-Affective coupling). Throughout the experiment, the anchoring process remains incomplete; the post-measurement is not a rewriting of history but a boundary-condition reassignment at the response terminal. Within this framework, all apparent “paradoxes” dissolve naturally. This paper does not deny the experimental data. It only points out: the problem is not in physics, but in ontology. It is not the future changing the past; it is the three-dimensional observer never having seen the complete four-dimensional anchoring process.