Breast cancer incidence and mortality in population studies of radiation exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background While breast cancer risk from high-dose ionising radiation is known, uncertainties remain about risks at lower doses and risk-modifying factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications on radiation-associated risk of breast cancer in women. Methods We included studies published in 2005–2022 that assessed breast cancer incidence or mortality in women exposed to ionising radiation. Risk of bias was evaluated. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated excess relative risks per gray (ERR/Gy). Results Of the 3522 articles screened, 106 met the inclusion criteria; 40 studies provided 44 ERR/Gy estimates. Overall, radiation exposure was associated with increased breast cancer risk (ERR/Gy = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29–0.83). Between-study heterogeneity ( I 2 = 95%) was substantially reduced in subgroup analyses, reaching 5% in low-dose-rate studies. Higher summary ERRs were observed for high dose-rate exposures, moderate (1–5 Gy) doses, childhood exposures, and attained age over 55. Lower but significantly increased risks were estimated for other subgroups and exposure scenarios. Conclusions Radiation exposure was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer among women, particularly following high dose-rates, moderate doses, childhood exposures, and older attained age. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021260610.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03503-0
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast cancer incidence and mortality in population studies of radiation exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lydia B. Zablotska, Brianna Frangione, Cécile M. Ronckers, Tarek Benzouak et al.
British Journal of Cancer
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Breast cancer incidence and mortality in population studies of radiation exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lydia B. Zablotska, Brianna Frangione, Cécile M. Ronckers, Tarek Benzouak, Tanvi Srivastava, Mark P. Little, Ekaterina Chirikova, Brittany Liu, Mayela T. Gillan, Richard Hu, Emma Quinn
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background While breast cancer risk from high-dose ionising radiation is known, uncertainties remain about risks at lower doses and risk-modifying factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications on radiation-associated risk of breast cancer in women. Methods We included studies published in 2005–2022 that assessed breast cancer incidence or mortality in women exposed to ionising radiation. Risk of bias was evaluated. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated excess relative risks per gray (ERR/Gy). Results Of the 3522 articles screened, 106 met the inclusion criteria; 40 studies provided 44 ERR/Gy estimates. Overall, radiation exposure was associated with increased breast cancer risk (ERR/Gy = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29–0.83). Between-study heterogeneity ( I 2 = 95%) was substantially reduced in subgroup analyses, reaching 5% in low-dose-rate studies. Higher summary ERRs were observed for high dose-rate exposures, moderate (1–5 Gy) doses, childhood exposures, and attained age over 55. Lower but significantly increased risks were estimated for other subgroups and exposure scenarios. Conclusions Radiation exposure was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer among women, particularly following high dose-rates, moderate doses, childhood exposures, and older attained age. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021260610.

British Journal of Cancer
Northwestern University (US), Oxford Brookes University (GB), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Calgary (CA), German Cancer Research Center (DE), University of California, San Francisco (US), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), McGill University (CA), Carleton University (CA), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Institute on Aging, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.