Teaching-focused faculty: the supports, structures, and policies that relate to their perceptions of influence on their colleagues’ teaching

Faculty stakeholders report an interest in hiring teaching-focused faculty for their pedagogical expertise which, if shared with colleagues, may substantially improve institutional academic outcomes. Drawing on self-determination theory, we surveyed 260 teaching-focused faculty across nine University of California campuses to identify the institutional supports, structures, and policies that predict faculty influence by satisfying their three basic psychological needs (BPNs): autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Several institutional factors were associated with faculty’s satisfaction of one or more basic psychological needs, and greater need satisfaction, especially relatedness, was associated with stronger perceived influence on colleagues’ teaching. These findings highlight specific institutional supports that administrators can leverage to increase faculty well-being and pedagogical influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal for Academic Development
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2026.2675015
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching-focused faculty: the supports, structures, and policies that relate to their perceptions of influence on their colleagues’ teaching

Peter McPartlan, Meaghan McMurran, Sabrina Solanki, Brian Sato
The International Journal for Academic Development
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Teaching-focused faculty: the supports, structures, and policies that relate to their perceptions of influence on their colleagues’ teaching

Peter McPartlan, Meaghan McMurran, Sabrina Solanki, Brian Sato
article en

Abstract

Faculty stakeholders report an interest in hiring teaching-focused faculty for their pedagogical expertise which, if shared with colleagues, may substantially improve institutional academic outcomes. Drawing on self-determination theory, we surveyed 260 teaching-focused faculty across nine University of California campuses to identify the institutional supports, structures, and policies that predict faculty influence by satisfying their three basic psychological needs (BPNs): autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Several institutional factors were associated with faculty’s satisfaction of one or more basic psychological needs, and greater need satisfaction, especially relatedness, was associated with stronger perceived influence on colleagues’ teaching. These findings highlight specific institutional supports that administrators can leverage to increase faculty well-being and pedagogical influence.

The International Journal for Academic Development
University of California System (US), MinebeaMitsumi (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.