Agreement Between Same-Day and Separate-Day Assessment of Critical Power, W′, and Peak Oxygen Uptake in Recreational Cyclists and Triathletes

Objective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine mean differences, reliability, and agreement between CP and W′ derived from a 3MAT performed after an ICT and values obtained during a standalone 3MAT performed on a separate day. Methods: Ten recreationally trained cyclists and triathletes completed four laboratory visits, including an ICT followed by a 3MAT after 30 min of recovery (same-day condition) and a standalone 3MAT performed on a separate day. CP and W′ were derived from both conditions and compared using paired t-tests and Bland–Altman agreement methods. Results: No systematic differences, but limited individual-level agreement were observed between same-day and separate-day conditions for CP (mean difference: 1.72 ± 36.5 W) or W′ (mean difference: 0.99 ± 5.9 kJ), with trivial to small effect sizes. Peak VO2 values were also not significantly different across testing conditions (p = 0.483). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed wide limits of agreement for both CP (−69.8 to 73.3 W) and W′ (−10.7 to 12.7 kJ), indicating substantial variability at the individual level. Conclusions: Although same-day testing does not introduce systematic bias in CP or W′ estimation, the wide limits of agreement suggest that these protocols are not interchangeable for individual monitoring. Same-day testing may be appropriate for group-level assessments but should be used with caution when applied to individual athlete monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiologia
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia6020043
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement Between Same-Day and Separate-Day Assessment of Critical Power, W′, and Peak Oxygen Uptake in Recreational Cyclists and Triathletes

John W Farrell, Caleb S. Clay, Payton E. Miller, Noah J. Perez
Physiologia
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Agreement Between Same-Day and Separate-Day Assessment of Critical Power, W′, and Peak Oxygen Uptake in Recreational Cyclists and Triathletes

John W Farrell, Caleb S. Clay, Payton E. Miller, Noah J. Perez
article en

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine mean differences, reliability, and agreement between CP and W′ derived from a 3MAT performed after an ICT and values obtained during a standalone 3MAT performed on a separate day. Methods: Ten recreationally trained cyclists and triathletes completed four laboratory visits, including an ICT followed by a 3MAT after 30 min of recovery (same-day condition) and a standalone 3MAT performed on a separate day. CP and W′ were derived from both conditions and compared using paired t-tests and Bland–Altman agreement methods. Results: No systematic differences, but limited individual-level agreement were observed between same-day and separate-day conditions for CP (mean difference: 1.72 ± 36.5 W) or W′ (mean difference: 0.99 ± 5.9 kJ), with trivial to small effect sizes. Peak VO2 values were also not significantly different across testing conditions (p = 0.483). However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed wide limits of agreement for both CP (−69.8 to 73.3 W) and W′ (−10.7 to 12.7 kJ), indicating substantial variability at the individual level. Conclusions: Although same-day testing does not introduce systematic bias in CP or W′ estimation, the wide limits of agreement suggest that these protocols are not interchangeable for individual monitoring. Same-day testing may be appropriate for group-level assessments but should be used with caution when applied to individual athlete monitoring.

PhysiologiaVol. 6(2)
Texas Tech University (US), Texas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.