Accessible for all? A longitudinal evaluation of the digital accessibility of all Australian university websites

University websites are essential platforms for disseminating information and facilitating online education. While existing research has identified accessibility gaps in Oceania’s higher education institutions, there remains a limited understanding of persistent barriers and insufficient continuous evaluation practices. This study addresses these gaps by conducting a two-phase accessibility evaluation (2022–2024) of 42 Australian university websites, employing a multi-method approach integrating automated tools and manual auditing. The findings reveal some improvement, primarily due to a reduction in the number of accessibility errors detected across university websites. However, common issues persist, including missing alternative text, inconsistent heading structures, unclear link and button labels, and elements that are not compatible with screen readers or other assistive technologies. Notably, critical accessibility issues that cannot be reliably detected by automated tools, such as focus visibility, inadequate colour contrast, and poor keyboard navigability, also persist. This study argues that ongoing web inaccessibility may exacerbate educational inequality. Additionally, we examine reasons behind the persistence of specific accessibility barriers and highlight the limitations of solely automated evaluations, illustrating why a hybrid evaluation approach is essential. Acknowledging limitations such as the time-bound nature of the evaluation, this study provides practical recommendations for administrators, developers, and policymakers, offering a robust framework for continuous and comprehensive accessibility assessment. While grounded in the Australian university context, these insights have global relevance for improving web accessibility in higher education institutions worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07283-z
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accessible for all? A longitudinal evaluation of the digital accessibility of all Australian university websites

Zixi Jiang, Jung‐Sook Lee, Therese M. Cumming, Md Badiuzzaman
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
article

Accessible for all? A longitudinal evaluation of the digital accessibility of all Australian university websites

Zixi Jiang, Jung‐Sook Lee, Therese M. Cumming, Md Badiuzzaman
article en

Abstract

University websites are essential platforms for disseminating information and facilitating online education. While existing research has identified accessibility gaps in Oceania’s higher education institutions, there remains a limited understanding of persistent barriers and insufficient continuous evaluation practices. This study addresses these gaps by conducting a two-phase accessibility evaluation (2022–2024) of 42 Australian university websites, employing a multi-method approach integrating automated tools and manual auditing. The findings reveal some improvement, primarily due to a reduction in the number of accessibility errors detected across university websites. However, common issues persist, including missing alternative text, inconsistent heading structures, unclear link and button labels, and elements that are not compatible with screen readers or other assistive technologies. Notably, critical accessibility issues that cannot be reliably detected by automated tools, such as focus visibility, inadequate colour contrast, and poor keyboard navigability, also persist. This study argues that ongoing web inaccessibility may exacerbate educational inequality. Additionally, we examine reasons behind the persistence of specific accessibility barriers and highlight the limitations of solely automated evaluations, illustrating why a hybrid evaluation approach is essential. Acknowledging limitations such as the time-bound nature of the evaluation, this study provides practical recommendations for administrators, developers, and policymakers, offering a robust framework for continuous and comprehensive accessibility assessment. While grounded in the Australian university context, these insights have global relevance for improving web accessibility in higher education institutions worldwide.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
University of Technology Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), South Metropolitan Technical and Further Education (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.