Participatory systems mapping as relational (but not relational enough) method for evaluating complex social phenomena

IMPACTPractitioners evaluating complex social phenomena such as the youth mental health crisis, segregation, or childhood poverty can benefit from taking a complexity-informed, participatory approach. This approach contributes to moving beyond linear and reductionist thinking by emphasizing the interconnected and systemic nature of public policy, program and project evaluation. This article provides practitioners with a better understanding of participatory systems mapping (PSM) as a tool for evaluation and enhances their informed use of it. When designing processes and using complexity-informed evaluation tools, it is important to stay aware of the situation and pay attention to relations, conflicts, and power imbalances in participatory settings. Participatory evaluation methods like PSM are valuable because they support inclusive, informed, and data-driven evaluations that highlight the relational aspects of complex social issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2687779
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participatory systems mapping as relational (but not relational enough) method for evaluating complex social phenomena

Paula Rossi, Harri Jalonen, Kyösti Husso
Public Money & Management
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

Participatory systems mapping as relational (but not relational enough) method for evaluating complex social phenomena

Paula Rossi, Harri Jalonen, Kyösti Husso
article en

Abstract

IMPACTPractitioners evaluating complex social phenomena such as the youth mental health crisis, segregation, or childhood poverty can benefit from taking a complexity-informed, participatory approach. This approach contributes to moving beyond linear and reductionist thinking by emphasizing the interconnected and systemic nature of public policy, program and project evaluation. This article provides practitioners with a better understanding of participatory systems mapping (PSM) as a tool for evaluation and enhances their informed use of it. When designing processes and using complexity-informed evaluation tools, it is important to stay aware of the situation and pay attention to relations, conflicts, and power imbalances in participatory settings. Participatory evaluation methods like PSM are valuable because they support inclusive, informed, and data-driven evaluations that highlight the relational aspects of complex social issues.

Public Money & Management
Tampere University (FI), University of Vaasa (FI)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.