Frontline Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of the Duty to Care During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Multi‐Method Study in Mozambique

COVID-19 intensified ethical tensions between clinicians' duty to care and self-protection amid PPE shortages. We explored frontline healthcare professionals' perspectives in Maputo, Mozambique. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals at four hospitals (April-June 2022) were recorded in Portuguese, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Fixed-response items were captured in REDCap and summarized descriptively. Fifty-three respondents described varied perspectives on duty. Nearly half affirmed unconditional obligations grounded in professional ethics. Many framed duty as contingent on available PPE and institutional support; 8% were unsure. Themes included irregular PPE distribution, unequal training, and reliance on informal information, shaping perceived risk, preparedness, and responsibility. Quantitative summaries echoed these patterns: only 58% reported receiving training, and as PPE re-supply declined many felt exposed. Sustaining duty to care in resource-constrained settings during an outbreak requires reliable PPE provision, equitable and timely training, and trustworthy communication systems to protect workers and strengthen health-system resilience. Sustaining duty to care in resource-constrained settings during an outbreak requires reliable PPE provision, equitable and timely training, and trustworthy communication systems to protect workers and strengthen health-system resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developing World Bioethics
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.70048
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frontline Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of the Duty to Care During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Multi‐Method Study in Mozambique

Khátia Munguambe, Esperança Sevene, Troy D. Moon, Graça Salomé et al.
Developing World Bioethics
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Frontline Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of the Duty to Care During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Multi‐Method Study in Mozambique

Khátia Munguambe, Esperança Sevene, Troy D. Moon, Graça Salomé, Elizabeth Heitman, Ângela Alface
article en

Abstract

COVID-19 intensified ethical tensions between clinicians' duty to care and self-protection amid PPE shortages. We explored frontline healthcare professionals' perspectives in Maputo, Mozambique. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals at four hospitals (April-June 2022) were recorded in Portuguese, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Fixed-response items were captured in REDCap and summarized descriptively. Fifty-three respondents described varied perspectives on duty. Nearly half affirmed unconditional obligations grounded in professional ethics. Many framed duty as contingent on available PPE and institutional support; 8% were unsure. Themes included irregular PPE distribution, unequal training, and reliance on informal information, shaping perceived risk, preparedness, and responsibility. Quantitative summaries echoed these patterns: only 58% reported receiving training, and as PPE re-supply declined many felt exposed. Sustaining duty to care in resource-constrained settings during an outbreak requires reliable PPE provision, equitable and timely training, and trustworthy communication systems to protect workers and strengthen health-system resilience. Sustaining duty to care in resource-constrained settings during an outbreak requires reliable PPE provision, equitable and timely training, and trustworthy communication systems to protect workers and strengthen health-system resilience.

Developing World Bioethics
Tulane University (US), Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), Hospital for Tropical Diseases (VN), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.