The Health of Nations Fund: Financing global drug development

We explore the design and performance of a "Health of Nations Fund," a proposed securitization of a biomedical "megafund" that pools capital to invest in a diversified set of global drug development projects. Incorporating assets from four stages of the drug development process as well as royalties from approved therapeutics across eight therapeutic areas, our Monte Carlo simulations show that such a megafund can deliver an annual expected return of 12.0% with a Sharpe ratio of 1.37, indicating a favorable balance between risk and return. At the same time, it finances an average of 25 approved drugs that potentially benefit approximately 44 million patients worldwide over a 14.5-year horizon. To enhance the fund's financial and therapeutic value, we integrate an optimization framework into our design that accounts for global disease prevalence and severity, allowing investors to adjust the allocation of capital according to their preferences for financial performance and healthcare impact. Sensitivity analyses indicate that this megafund typically generates double-digit annual returns across most scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005248
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Health of Nations Fund: Financing global drug development

Joonhyuk Cho, Chaoyi Zhao, Andrew W. Lo, Manish Singh et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

The Health of Nations Fund: Financing global drug development

Joonhyuk Cho, Chaoyi Zhao, Andrew W. Lo, Manish Singh, Shomesh E. Chaudhuri
article en

Abstract

We explore the design and performance of a "Health of Nations Fund," a proposed securitization of a biomedical "megafund" that pools capital to invest in a diversified set of global drug development projects. Incorporating assets from four stages of the drug development process as well as royalties from approved therapeutics across eight therapeutic areas, our Monte Carlo simulations show that such a megafund can deliver an annual expected return of 12.0% with a Sharpe ratio of 1.37, indicating a favorable balance between risk and return. At the same time, it finances an average of 25 approved drugs that potentially benefit approximately 44 million patients worldwide over a 14.5-year horizon. To enhance the fund's financial and therapeutic value, we integrate an optimization framework into our design that accounts for global disease prevalence and severity, allowing investors to adjust the allocation of capital according to their preferences for financial performance and healthcare impact. Sensitivity analyses indicate that this megafund typically generates double-digit annual returns across most scenarios.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(6)
Santa Fe Institute (US), QED Technologies (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.