Healthcare professionals’ conceptualizations of palliative care and readiness for early integration: a cross‑sectional mixed‑methods survey in Finland

BACKGROUND: Early integration of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer is recommended by major organizations and guidelines, yet palliative care is often still perceived as end-of-life care or as incompatible with active oncological treatment. Such misconceptions may delay timely integration. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed-methods survey among healthcare professionals in oncology services in Ostrobothnia, Finland. The survey included 15 Likert-scale statements (1-5) addressing perceived knowledge, values and role beliefs, and perceived capacity and support, plus one free-text question: "What is palliative care?". Likert responses were summarized descriptively and compared across demographic groups using non-parametric tests. Free-text responses were coded using a predefined framework of 25 themes derived from the WHO definition of palliative care and Finnish national quality recommendations, generating a binary concept-coverage score (0-25). Responses were also classified for an end-of-life/non-concurrent conceptualization ("non-concurrent framing"). Group differences in concept-coverage scores were tested using Mann-Whitney U. RESULTS: Ninety-six professionals completed the survey (response rate 88.1%); 95 responded to the free-text item. While participants strongly endorsed statements about palliative care benefits and values, endorsement was lower for perceived competence and lowest for resources and support. Nearly one-third of participants expressed a non-concurrent/end-of-life framing of palliative care in their free-text definition. Concept-coverage scores were significantly lower among participants with non-concurrent framing compared with those without, particularly framework categories related to practical factors and system-level drivers. CONCLUSION: The open-ended responses indicated variability in the conceptualization of palliative care, including descriptions consistent with an end-of-life or non-concurrent view. This pattern identifies a potential target for education and implementation aligned with national guidance and quality recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02194-x
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare professionals’ conceptualizations of palliative care and readiness for early integration: a cross‑sectional mixed‑methods survey in Finland

Ella Saaranen, Heidi Andersén, Nelli-Sofia Nåhls, Mikael Johansson et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Healthcare professionals’ conceptualizations of palliative care and readiness for early integration: a cross‑sectional mixed‑methods survey in Finland

Ella Saaranen, Heidi Andersén, Nelli-Sofia Nåhls, Mikael Johansson, Ebba Åström
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early integration of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer is recommended by major organizations and guidelines, yet palliative care is often still perceived as end-of-life care or as incompatible with active oncological treatment. Such misconceptions may delay timely integration. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed-methods survey among healthcare professionals in oncology services in Ostrobothnia, Finland. The survey included 15 Likert-scale statements (1-5) addressing perceived knowledge, values and role beliefs, and perceived capacity and support, plus one free-text question: "What is palliative care?". Likert responses were summarized descriptively and compared across demographic groups using non-parametric tests. Free-text responses were coded using a predefined framework of 25 themes derived from the WHO definition of palliative care and Finnish national quality recommendations, generating a binary concept-coverage score (0-25). Responses were also classified for an end-of-life/non-concurrent conceptualization ("non-concurrent framing"). Group differences in concept-coverage scores were tested using Mann-Whitney U. RESULTS: Ninety-six professionals completed the survey (response rate 88.1%); 95 responded to the free-text item. While participants strongly endorsed statements about palliative care benefits and values, endorsement was lower for perceived competence and lowest for resources and support. Nearly one-third of participants expressed a non-concurrent/end-of-life framing of palliative care in their free-text definition. Concept-coverage scores were significantly lower among participants with non-concurrent framing compared with those without, particularly framework categories related to practical factors and system-level drivers. CONCLUSION: The open-ended responses indicated variability in the conceptualization of palliative care, including descriptions consistent with an end-of-life or non-concurrent view. This pattern identifies a potential target for education and implementation aligned with national guidance and quality recommendations.

BMC Palliative Care
University of Turku (FI), Turku University Hospital (FI), Vaasa Central Hospital (FI), Vanha Vaasa hospital (FI), University of Vaasa (FI), Umeå University (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.