Development of a Video‐Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Screening Among Older Women

BACKGROUND: Whether to continue breast cancer screening beyond age 74 is uncertain. Decision aids may improve understanding of health information and support informed screening decisions. The goal of this study was to develop a video-based decision aid for breast cancer screening among older women using patient-centered design. METHODS: Following the Framework for Innovation, the research team first used formative focus groups to understand older women's perspectives on mammography. We developed a prototype video based on decision aid best practices and formative focus group findings. We then evaluated the content, clarity, and style of the decision aid in cognitive testing focus groups. We made iterative changes to the video in response to focus group feedback. Focus groups included women age ≥ 70 without a personal history of breast cancer from Connecticut-area community and clinical settings. We coded and analyzed transcripts using both abductive and deductive approaches. RESULTS: We convened 6 formative focus groups and 7 cognitive testing groups with 31 participants (mean age 78 [range 70-93]); 39% Black, 58% White, and 3% Latina. In focus groups, participants perceived screening as largely beneficial and saw overdiagnosis as unfamiliar. Some participants valued quantitative information about risks and benefits of screening, while others relied on experience, perceptions of risk, and beliefs about the efficacy of mammography to make screening decisions. We incorporated these perspectives into the framing, language, and narrative arc of the decision aid. In cognitive testing focus groups, participants found the decision aid informative and engaging. DISCUSSION: Using a patient-centered approach, we developed a video-based decision aid for breast cancer screening for older women. Our design, which drew on the perspectives of older women, was perceived as easy to understand and informative. We will assess the impact of the decision aid on decision quality, decisional conflict, and intention to screen in future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70526
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Video‐Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Screening Among Older Women

Ilana B. Richman, Mara A. Schonberg, Meghan E. Lindsay, Sadde Mohamed et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Development of a Video‐Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Screening Among Older Women

Ilana B. Richman, Mara A. Schonberg, Meghan E. Lindsay, Sadde Mohamed, Claire King, Nancy L. Schoenborn, Iyanuoluwa Odole
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether to continue breast cancer screening beyond age 74 is uncertain. Decision aids may improve understanding of health information and support informed screening decisions. The goal of this study was to develop a video-based decision aid for breast cancer screening among older women using patient-centered design. METHODS: Following the Framework for Innovation, the research team first used formative focus groups to understand older women's perspectives on mammography. We developed a prototype video based on decision aid best practices and formative focus group findings. We then evaluated the content, clarity, and style of the decision aid in cognitive testing focus groups. We made iterative changes to the video in response to focus group feedback. Focus groups included women age ≥ 70 without a personal history of breast cancer from Connecticut-area community and clinical settings. We coded and analyzed transcripts using both abductive and deductive approaches. RESULTS: We convened 6 formative focus groups and 7 cognitive testing groups with 31 participants (mean age 78 [range 70-93]); 39% Black, 58% White, and 3% Latina. In focus groups, participants perceived screening as largely beneficial and saw overdiagnosis as unfamiliar. Some participants valued quantitative information about risks and benefits of screening, while others relied on experience, perceptions of risk, and beliefs about the efficacy of mammography to make screening decisions. We incorporated these perspectives into the framing, language, and narrative arc of the decision aid. In cognitive testing focus groups, participants found the decision aid informative and engaging. DISCUSSION: Using a patient-centered approach, we developed a video-based decision aid for breast cancer screening for older women. Our design, which drew on the perspectives of older women, was perceived as easy to understand and informative. We will assess the impact of the decision aid on decision quality, decisional conflict, and intention to screen in future work.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Yale University (US), Publicis Groupe (Germany) (DE)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.