Experienced Weight Stigma Changes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: Experiencing weight stigmatization is linked to maladaptive eating, poorer mental health, and increased risk of weight gain, potentially impacting metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize patient experiences of weight stigmatization before and after MBS and to examine the association of presurgical weight stigma on postsurgical weight loss. METHODS: This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched through March 2025; eligible studies included published articles and dissertations/theses available in English that quantitatively measured presurgical weight stigma among MBS samples and included relevant outcomes. Meta-analyses utilized random effects models with change scores converted to Hedge's g and associations between presurgical experienced weight stigma and post-MBS weight change converted to coefficient r. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included, with 36 reporting on experienced weight stigma change pre- to post-MBS and 10 studies reporting on the relationship between pre-MBS experienced weight stigma and post-MBS weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed weight stigmatization decreased substantially after MBS (6-12 months, g = 1.28; 13-24 months, g = 1.16; 25-36 months, g = 1.26). Presurgical weight stigma was not associated with weight loss post-surgery (r = 0.05). Findings are limited by minimal studies reporting on longer term relationships between baseline stigma, post-MBS weight loss, and additional health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Reviews
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70179
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experienced Weight Stigma Changes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Lara LaCaille, Afton M. Koball, Dakota L. Leget, A. Niemann et al.
Obesity Reviews
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Experienced Weight Stigma Changes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Lara LaCaille, Afton M. Koball, Dakota L. Leget, A. Niemann, Rick A. LaCaille, Hannah Farnsworth, Chloë Z. Backderf, Carly R. Mastrian, Ellie M. Von Duyke
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experiencing weight stigmatization is linked to maladaptive eating, poorer mental health, and increased risk of weight gain, potentially impacting metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize patient experiences of weight stigmatization before and after MBS and to examine the association of presurgical weight stigma on postsurgical weight loss. METHODS: This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched through March 2025; eligible studies included published articles and dissertations/theses available in English that quantitatively measured presurgical weight stigma among MBS samples and included relevant outcomes. Meta-analyses utilized random effects models with change scores converted to Hedge's g and associations between presurgical experienced weight stigma and post-MBS weight change converted to coefficient r. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included, with 36 reporting on experienced weight stigma change pre- to post-MBS and 10 studies reporting on the relationship between pre-MBS experienced weight stigma and post-MBS weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed weight stigmatization decreased substantially after MBS (6-12 months, g = 1.28; 13-24 months, g = 1.16; 25-36 months, g = 1.26). Presurgical weight stigma was not associated with weight loss post-surgery (r = 0.05). Findings are limited by minimal studies reporting on longer term relationships between baseline stigma, post-MBS weight loss, and additional health outcomes.

Obesity Reviews
Mayo Clinic (US), University of Utah (US), University of Florida Health (US), University of Minnesota, Duluth (US), Utah Department of Health (US), University of Utah Health Care (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.