Optimization of Sample Processing for Droplet Digital PCR Quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Liver

Accurate detection of Campylobacter in chicken liver is hindered by strong matrix inhibition. This study evaluated sample-processing strategies to improve droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in chicken liver. Mechanical homogenization (Stomacher) and enzymatic/mechanical dissociation (gentleMACS), with and without 8 μm filtration, were compared. Particle-size analysis showed that filtration, especially following gentleMACS treatment, produced smaller, more uniform particles and reduced variability. Percent-degradation assays confirmed that gentleMACS achieved substantially greater tissue disruption than Stomacher homogenization. The multiplex ddPCR assay, which simultaneously targets C. coli and C. jejuni, produced droplet counts comparable to single-target reactions, indicating minimal interference between targets under the conditions tested. In inoculated liver samples, gentleMACS processing yielded droplet counts similar to those obtained from pure cultures, whereas unprocessed liver caused severe matrix interference and inconsistent quantification. Furthermore, gentleMACS-treated samples exhibited strong log-to-log linearity for quantifying C. coli and C. jejuni, enabling detection near 1 genome copy equivalent per reaction. Overall, the results indicate that enzymatic/mechanical dissociation combined with fine-pore filtration improves ddPCR detection of Campylobacter species in chicken liver.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pathogens
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15060638
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Sample Processing for Droplet Digital PCR Quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Liver

Joseph A. Capobianco, Chin‐Yi Chen, Yiping He
Pathogens
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
article

Optimization of Sample Processing for Droplet Digital PCR Quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Liver

Joseph A. Capobianco, Chin‐Yi Chen, Yiping He
article en

Abstract

Accurate detection of Campylobacter in chicken liver is hindered by strong matrix inhibition. This study evaluated sample-processing strategies to improve droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in chicken liver. Mechanical homogenization (Stomacher) and enzymatic/mechanical dissociation (gentleMACS), with and without 8 μm filtration, were compared. Particle-size analysis showed that filtration, especially following gentleMACS treatment, produced smaller, more uniform particles and reduced variability. Percent-degradation assays confirmed that gentleMACS achieved substantially greater tissue disruption than Stomacher homogenization. The multiplex ddPCR assay, which simultaneously targets C. coli and C. jejuni, produced droplet counts comparable to single-target reactions, indicating minimal interference between targets under the conditions tested. In inoculated liver samples, gentleMACS processing yielded droplet counts similar to those obtained from pure cultures, whereas unprocessed liver caused severe matrix interference and inconsistent quantification. Furthermore, gentleMACS-treated samples exhibited strong log-to-log linearity for quantifying C. coli and C. jejuni, enabling detection near 1 genome copy equivalent per reaction. Overall, the results indicate that enzymatic/mechanical dissociation combined with fine-pore filtration improves ddPCR detection of Campylobacter species in chicken liver.

PathogensVol. 15(6)
Agricultural Research Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), Eastern Regional Research Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.