China's Identity Construction in Global Data Governance

As data governance becomes a central arena for normative contestation and global standard-setting, China's state-centric governance model has emerged as a third paradigm alongside the US's market-oriented model and the EU's rights-based data protection regime. This study argues that prevailing interpretations portraying China as an authoritarian challenger to the liberal order overlook its domestic context, developmental imperatives, and the relational dynamics that shape its global engagement. Drawing on constructivist theory, the study examines discourse between 2012 and 2025, including laws, white papers, and official statements, to analyse how China constructs its corporate and social identities in global data governance. The findings show that its corporate identity links data regulation to developmental legitimacy, while its social identity reflects differentiated engagement with the US, EU, and Global South. Overall, China's data governance represents a form of normative pragmatism combining domestic stability, societal participation, and multi-lateral cooperation within an evolving pluralistic digital order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026261455056
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China's Identity Construction in Global Data Governance

Danni Zhang, Xuechen Chen, Xinchuchu Gao
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

China's Identity Construction in Global Data Governance

Danni Zhang, Xuechen Chen, Xinchuchu Gao
article en

Abstract

As data governance becomes a central arena for normative contestation and global standard-setting, China's state-centric governance model has emerged as a third paradigm alongside the US's market-oriented model and the EU's rights-based data protection regime. This study argues that prevailing interpretations portraying China as an authoritarian challenger to the liberal order overlook its domestic context, developmental imperatives, and the relational dynamics that shape its global engagement. Drawing on constructivist theory, the study examines discourse between 2012 and 2025, including laws, white papers, and official statements, to analyse how China constructs its corporate and social identities in global data governance. The findings show that its corporate identity links data regulation to developmental legitimacy, while its social identity reflects differentiated engagement with the US, EU, and Global South. Overall, China's data governance represents a form of normative pragmatism combining domestic stability, societal participation, and multi-lateral cooperation within an evolving pluralistic digital order.

Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
University of Kent (GB), University of Lincoln (GB), Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.