Reading surfaces deeply: affect(ion) in Premchand’s ‘The Holy Panchayat’

The essay argues that Munshi Premchand’s hugely popular short story, ‘The Holy Panchayat’ (1916), casts light on the contemporary debate around surface reading, postcritique, and symptomatic reading. Anticipating some of the issues raised, the theory of reading I identify in Premchand’s much earlier story problematises drawing rigid distinctions between methodological protocols that emphasise a literary work’s affective structure against critical prerogatives that are invested in examining a work’s ideological ramifications. Specifically, by reading the meaning of the story’s prevailing reading – which I suggest has been singularly attentive to the affect evinced by the text – the essay underlines the problems of separating reading practices that focalise ethics and affect, to the exclusion of ideology. The essay thus recovers a latent strain of symptomatic reading or ideology-critique: one that neither reduces its purchase to investigating a work’s conditions of possibility nor limits itself to attending to a work’s historical context, but rather affirms its impetus to reflect on the affect-laden act of reading itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Textual Practice
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2026.2682991
Primary Topic
Short Stories in Global Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading surfaces deeply: affect(ion) in Premchand’s ‘The Holy Panchayat’

Ashwin Bajaj
Textual Practice
Short Stories in Global Literature
article

Reading surfaces deeply: affect(ion) in Premchand’s ‘The Holy Panchayat’

Ashwin Bajaj
article en

Abstract

The essay argues that Munshi Premchand’s hugely popular short story, ‘The Holy Panchayat’ (1916), casts light on the contemporary debate around surface reading, postcritique, and symptomatic reading. Anticipating some of the issues raised, the theory of reading I identify in Premchand’s much earlier story problematises drawing rigid distinctions between methodological protocols that emphasise a literary work’s affective structure against critical prerogatives that are invested in examining a work’s ideological ramifications. Specifically, by reading the meaning of the story’s prevailing reading – which I suggest has been singularly attentive to the affect evinced by the text – the essay underlines the problems of separating reading practices that focalise ethics and affect, to the exclusion of ideology. The essay thus recovers a latent strain of symptomatic reading or ideology-critique: one that neither reduces its purchase to investigating a work’s conditions of possibility nor limits itself to attending to a work’s historical context, but rather affirms its impetus to reflect on the affect-laden act of reading itself.

Textual Practice
University of California, Irvine (US), Williams College (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Short Stories in Global Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.