IoT-Driven Robust Bearing Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors Under Operating-Condition Shift

Reliable bearing fault diagnosis in induction motors is essential for predictive maintenance and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications. However, diagnostic models that perform well under random or measurement-wise data splits may fail when deployed under unseen operating conditions. This study presents a robustness-oriented comparative evaluation of induction motor bearing fault diagnosis models using vibration and phase-current signals from a controlled medium subset of the Paderborn bearing dataset. Raw temporal 1D-CNN models, STFT-based 2D-CNN representations, and vibration–current fusion strategies were evaluated under measurement-wise and operating-condition holdout protocols. Under measurement-wise validation, the 1D-CNN Early Fusion model achieved a Macro-F1 score of 0.9251. Under the stricter operating-condition holdout setting, the same model achieved the highest robustness among the evaluated CNN models. Multi-seed validation confirmed its stability, with a mean Macro-F1 of 0.8626, a worst-case Macro-F1 of 0.7159, and a robustness score of 0.7850. The selected model remained lightweight, requiring 73,891 trainable parameters and an estimated model size of 0.282 MB. Additional revision experiments were conducted to address bearing-identity sharing and classical baseline comparisons. In the bearing-code-disjoint validation test, both raw temporal models showed reduced performance, and early fusion did not significantly outperform vibration-only learning. The 1D-CNN Vibration model achieved a mean Macro-F1 of 0.5616, while the 1D-CNN Early Fusion model achieved 0.5485; the paired Wilcoxon test was not significant (p = 0.2016). Classical baselines using handcrafted time-domain, frequency-domain, envelope-inspired, and spectral-kurtosis features were also evaluated. The strongest classical baseline, vibration-feature XGBoost, achieved a mean Macro-F1 of 0.8582 under condition-holdout validation. Overall, the findings show that lightweight vibration–current early fusion provides a favorable robustness–complexity trade-off under operating-condition shift. However, the bearing-code-disjoint results indicate that complete generalization to unseen bearing identities remains challenging. Therefore, the deployment claims are limited to computational feasibility indicators, and further validation on embedded hardware, additional datasets, and stricter cross-domain protocols is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26123829
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IoT-Driven Robust Bearing Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors Under Operating-Condition Shift

Şükrü Mustafa Kaya, Alireza Esmaeili Jobani
Sensors
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
article

IoT-Driven Robust Bearing Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors Under Operating-Condition Shift

Şükrü Mustafa Kaya, Alireza Esmaeili Jobani
article en

Abstract

Reliable bearing fault diagnosis in induction motors is essential for predictive maintenance and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications. However, diagnostic models that perform well under random or measurement-wise data splits may fail when deployed under unseen operating conditions. This study presents a robustness-oriented comparative evaluation of induction motor bearing fault diagnosis models using vibration and phase-current signals from a controlled medium subset of the Paderborn bearing dataset. Raw temporal 1D-CNN models, STFT-based 2D-CNN representations, and vibration–current fusion strategies were evaluated under measurement-wise and operating-condition holdout protocols. Under measurement-wise validation, the 1D-CNN Early Fusion model achieved a Macro-F1 score of 0.9251. Under the stricter operating-condition holdout setting, the same model achieved the highest robustness among the evaluated CNN models. Multi-seed validation confirmed its stability, with a mean Macro-F1 of 0.8626, a worst-case Macro-F1 of 0.7159, and a robustness score of 0.7850. The selected model remained lightweight, requiring 73,891 trainable parameters and an estimated model size of 0.282 MB. Additional revision experiments were conducted to address bearing-identity sharing and classical baseline comparisons. In the bearing-code-disjoint validation test, both raw temporal models showed reduced performance, and early fusion did not significantly outperform vibration-only learning. The 1D-CNN Vibration model achieved a mean Macro-F1 of 0.5616, while the 1D-CNN Early Fusion model achieved 0.5485; the paired Wilcoxon test was not significant (p = 0.2016). Classical baselines using handcrafted time-domain, frequency-domain, envelope-inspired, and spectral-kurtosis features were also evaluated. The strongest classical baseline, vibration-feature XGBoost, achieved a mean Macro-F1 of 0.8582 under condition-holdout validation. Overall, the findings show that lightweight vibration–current early fusion provides a favorable robustness–complexity trade-off under operating-condition shift. However, the bearing-code-disjoint results indicate that complete generalization to unseen bearing identities remains challenging. Therefore, the deployment claims are limited to computational feasibility indicators, and further validation on embedded hardware, additional datasets, and stricter cross-domain protocols is required.

SensorsVol. 26(12)
Istanbul Aydın University (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.