Tectonic, depth, and magnitude controls on global earthquake stress drop

Earthquake stress drop is a key parameter linking fault strength, rupture dynamics, and high-frequency ground motion, yet global observations exhibit variability spanning more than two orders of magnitude. This study reassesses the primary controls on stress-drop variability using a harmonized global database of 1748 earthquakes (Mw ≥ 5.5). Each event is classified by tectonic environment, focal depth, and faulting style, enabling a systematic evaluation of how these factors jointly influence stress drop. We find that intraplate earthquakes systematically exhibit higher stress drops than plate-boundary events across nearly all depth ranges. Depth exerts a strong control on stress-drop distributions: median values increase from the upper crust to the lithospheric mantle, and magnitude scaling becomes increasingly negative with depth. A multivariate regression incorporating Mw, depth, tectonic setting, and mechanism explains ∼4% of total variance, indicating substantial intrinsic variability but confirming that tectonic environment and depth contribute significant, though modest, systematic effects. Global kernel-smoothed maps reveal coherent regional patterns, including elevated stress drops within continental and oceanic intraplate domains and localized high-Δσ patches near subduction interfaces. K-means regionalization shows that ∼11% of the global variance in stress drop is attributable to large-scale tectonic domains. Faulting style produces weaker effects: reverse and strike-slip earthquakes show broadly similar distributions and magnitude scaling once depth and tectonic setting are accounted for. Collectively, these results demonstrate that tectonic environment and lithospheric depth are first-order controls on global stress-drop variability, providing new observational constraints on earthquake rupture physics and seismic hazard in intraplate regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solid Earth Sciences
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sesci.2026.100324
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tectonic, depth, and magnitude controls on global earthquake stress drop

Antonino D’Alessandro
Solid Earth Sciences
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Tectonic, depth, and magnitude controls on global earthquake stress drop

Antonino D’Alessandro
article en

Abstract

Earthquake stress drop is a key parameter linking fault strength, rupture dynamics, and high-frequency ground motion, yet global observations exhibit variability spanning more than two orders of magnitude. This study reassesses the primary controls on stress-drop variability using a harmonized global database of 1748 earthquakes (Mw ≥ 5.5). Each event is classified by tectonic environment, focal depth, and faulting style, enabling a systematic evaluation of how these factors jointly influence stress drop. We find that intraplate earthquakes systematically exhibit higher stress drops than plate-boundary events across nearly all depth ranges. Depth exerts a strong control on stress-drop distributions: median values increase from the upper crust to the lithospheric mantle, and magnitude scaling becomes increasingly negative with depth. A multivariate regression incorporating Mw, depth, tectonic setting, and mechanism explains ∼4% of total variance, indicating substantial intrinsic variability but confirming that tectonic environment and depth contribute significant, though modest, systematic effects. Global kernel-smoothed maps reveal coherent regional patterns, including elevated stress drops within continental and oceanic intraplate domains and localized high-Δσ patches near subduction interfaces. K-means regionalization shows that ∼11% of the global variance in stress drop is attributable to large-scale tectonic domains. Faulting style produces weaker effects: reverse and strike-slip earthquakes show broadly similar distributions and magnitude scaling once depth and tectonic setting are accounted for. Collectively, these results demonstrate that tectonic environment and lithospheric depth are first-order controls on global stress-drop variability, providing new observational constraints on earthquake rupture physics and seismic hazard in intraplate regions.

Solid Earth SciencesVol. 11(3)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.