Analysis of the radionuclides and heavy metals concentrations of the Vaal River, South Africa.

<ns3:p>Background This study was conducted to examine the radionuclide and heavy metal concentrations in the water upstream and downstream of the Vaal River. Methods The study used the ICP-MS to determine radionuclides and heavy metals. A total of 27 water samples were collected were collected for analysis. The analysis was mainly for Li, B, Pb, Cu, Co, Ni, Zn, Mn, Fe, and P radionuclides, such as K, Th, and U, using ICP-MS. Results The carcinogenic human health risk values (mg/l) of heavy metals were estimated using the USEPA 2011 guidelines. The chronic daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), and hazard index (HI) due to the ingestion of river water were calculated from the adopted USEPA 2011 guidelines. The risk values were estimated for an adult at 70 years of age with a body weight of 70 kg and a child at 15 years of age with a body weight of 15 kg. CDI in mg/kg/day had high concentrations of Cu at 9, 33E+02, B, P, and Zn at a constant concentration of 5, 60E+02. The calculated risk value was greater than 1 because of the carcinogenic risk of cancer. K, Th, and U in Bq/l were also analyzed using ICP-MS. Radium equivalent activity (and) dose rate. (D), annual effective dose (AEDE), external hazard (Hex), and internal hazard (Hin) indices were used to determine potential radiological risks. The calculated average radiation hazard for Raeq was (33,803 Bq/l), D (18,158 nGy/h), AEDE (0, 0222 nGy/hr), Hex (0,091) and Hin (0,096) in this study. These hazard parameters were lower than the world average permissible limit, and as a result, the hazard parameters did not pose radiological risks due to the ingestion of river water. Conclusions According to the calculated Raeq, D, AEDE, Hex, and Hin index hazard parameters used for river water analysis, this study does not pose radiological risks to humans. The heavy metal concentrations in this study also proved that the Vaal River is not safe for public use. This is a result of the high concentrations of heavy metals in water across all elements. Therefore, additional river monitoring is required to maintain public safety.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.178758.1
Primary Topic
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the radionuclides and heavy metals concentrations of the Vaal River, South Africa.

Manny Mathuthu, CHOBEKA BOITSHEKWANE TRYPHINA, Ocwelwang Atsile
F1000Research
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
article

Analysis of the radionuclides and heavy metals concentrations of the Vaal River, South Africa.

Manny Mathuthu, CHOBEKA BOITSHEKWANE TRYPHINA, Ocwelwang Atsile
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background This study was conducted to examine the radionuclide and heavy metal concentrations in the water upstream and downstream of the Vaal River. Methods The study used the ICP-MS to determine radionuclides and heavy metals. A total of 27 water samples were collected were collected for analysis. The analysis was mainly for Li, B, Pb, Cu, Co, Ni, Zn, Mn, Fe, and P radionuclides, such as K, Th, and U, using ICP-MS. Results The carcinogenic human health risk values (mg/l) of heavy metals were estimated using the USEPA 2011 guidelines. The chronic daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), and hazard index (HI) due to the ingestion of river water were calculated from the adopted USEPA 2011 guidelines. The risk values were estimated for an adult at 70 years of age with a body weight of 70 kg and a child at 15 years of age with a body weight of 15 kg. CDI in mg/kg/day had high concentrations of Cu at 9, 33E+02, B, P, and Zn at a constant concentration of 5, 60E+02. The calculated risk value was greater than 1 because of the carcinogenic risk of cancer. K, Th, and U in Bq/l were also analyzed using ICP-MS. Radium equivalent activity (and) dose rate. (D), annual effective dose (AEDE), external hazard (Hex), and internal hazard (Hin) indices were used to determine potential radiological risks. The calculated average radiation hazard for Raeq was (33,803 Bq/l), D (18,158 nGy/h), AEDE (0, 0222 nGy/hr), Hex (0,091) and Hin (0,096) in this study. These hazard parameters were lower than the world average permissible limit, and as a result, the hazard parameters did not pose radiological risks due to the ingestion of river water. Conclusions According to the calculated Raeq, D, AEDE, Hex, and Hin index hazard parameters used for river water analysis, this study does not pose radiological risks to humans. The heavy metal concentrations in this study also proved that the Vaal River is not safe for public use. This is a result of the high concentrations of heavy metals in water across all elements. Therefore, additional river monitoring is required to maintain public safety.</ns3:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
North-West University (ZA), Education Labour Relations Council (ZA)
North-West University
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.