ToxiSpecies: Task-Aware Meta-Learning for Cross-Species Modeling of Acute Chemical Toxicity under Distribution Shift

Reliable modeling of chemical toxicity across species poses a fundamental challenge for molecular property prediction, as toxicity data sets are inherently heterogeneous in species coverage, endpoints, measurement scales, and data availability. From a learning perspective, cross-species acute toxicity prediction constitutes a heterogeneous multitask problem characterized by simultaneous covariate shifts in chemical feature distributions and conditional shifts in toxicity labels across endpoints such as LC 50, LD 50, LD Lo, and TD Lo . Here, we present ToxiSpecies, a task-aware meta-learning framework designed to explicitly address these distributional mismatches in low-resource toxicity modeling. The framework introduces a dual-adapter architecture that decouples species-level feature adaptation from endpoint-level modeling of toxicity semantics, enabling robust knowledge transfer across species and toxicity endpoints under low-resource settings. ToxiSpecies was evaluated on a large-scale benchmark comprising 107 endpoint–species tasks, 42 species, and 78,820 chemicals, spanning aquatic and mammalian acute toxicity measurements. Across this heterogeneous benchmark, ToxiSpecies achieved strong and broadly competitive performance relative to classical quantitative structure–activity relationship models, modern deep learning baselines, and representative meta-learning approaches. Under low-resource intra-aquatic transfer settings, the feature adapter substantially reduced root mean squared error (up to 72.6% in low-resource intra-aquatic transfer), whereas the dual adapter provided a more balanced overall trade-off between prediction accuracy and correlation performance and showed clear benefits in the 8:1:1 mixed-transfer setting. Beyond aggregate accuracy gains, ToxiSpecies demonstrated improved robustness under low-data conditions, reliable animal-to-human extrapolation, and enhanced separation of structurally related compounds exhibiting substantially divergent toxicity profiles. Embedding analyses further revealed that the learned representations capture fine-grained structure–toxicity determinants relevant to hazard differentiation and endpoint-specific sensitivity. Together, these results suggest that ToxiSpecies represents a promising framework for heterogeneous chemical toxicity prediction, potentially supporting data-driven hazard prioritization in regulatory toxicology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01358
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ToxiSpecies: Task-Aware Meta-Learning for Cross-Species Modeling of Acute Chemical Toxicity under Distribution Shift

Song He, Yi-Xiang Wang, Caiyun Zhao, Xiaochen Bo
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

ToxiSpecies: Task-Aware Meta-Learning for Cross-Species Modeling of Acute Chemical Toxicity under Distribution Shift

Song He, Yi-Xiang Wang, Caiyun Zhao, Xiaochen Bo
article en

Abstract

Reliable modeling of chemical toxicity across species poses a fundamental challenge for molecular property prediction, as toxicity data sets are inherently heterogeneous in species coverage, endpoints, measurement scales, and data availability. From a learning perspective, cross-species acute toxicity prediction constitutes a heterogeneous multitask problem characterized by simultaneous covariate shifts in chemical feature distributions and conditional shifts in toxicity labels across endpoints such as LC 50, LD 50, LD Lo, and TD Lo . Here, we present ToxiSpecies, a task-aware meta-learning framework designed to explicitly address these distributional mismatches in low-resource toxicity modeling. The framework introduces a dual-adapter architecture that decouples species-level feature adaptation from endpoint-level modeling of toxicity semantics, enabling robust knowledge transfer across species and toxicity endpoints under low-resource settings. ToxiSpecies was evaluated on a large-scale benchmark comprising 107 endpoint–species tasks, 42 species, and 78,820 chemicals, spanning aquatic and mammalian acute toxicity measurements. Across this heterogeneous benchmark, ToxiSpecies achieved strong and broadly competitive performance relative to classical quantitative structure–activity relationship models, modern deep learning baselines, and representative meta-learning approaches. Under low-resource intra-aquatic transfer settings, the feature adapter substantially reduced root mean squared error (up to 72.6% in low-resource intra-aquatic transfer), whereas the dual adapter provided a more balanced overall trade-off between prediction accuracy and correlation performance and showed clear benefits in the 8:1:1 mixed-transfer setting. Beyond aggregate accuracy gains, ToxiSpecies demonstrated improved robustness under low-data conditions, reliable animal-to-human extrapolation, and enhanced separation of structurally related compounds exhibiting substantially divergent toxicity profiles. Embedding analyses further revealed that the learned representations capture fine-grained structure–toxicity determinants relevant to hazard differentiation and endpoint-specific sensitivity. Together, these results suggest that ToxiSpecies represents a promising framework for heterogeneous chemical toxicity prediction, potentially supporting data-driven hazard prioritization in regulatory toxicology.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Nankai University (CN), Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN), Drug Discovery Laboratory (Norway) (NO)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.