De Novo Aortic Insufficiency and Its Progression in Patients on Microaxial Flow Pump Support Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device

Aortic insufficiency (AI) is associated with worse outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Microaxial flow pumps (mAFP) are increasingly used to stabilize cardiogenic shock pre-LVAD, but their transvalvular nature raises concerns for valvular damage. We studied AI incidence and outcomes in HeartMate 3 (HM3) recipients supported by mAFP. A single-center retrospective analysis (2014-2023) compared HM3 recipients bridged with mAFP to those supported by inotropes or other mechanical circulatory support. A secondary analysis used a propensity-matched cohort. The primary outcome was the incidence of significant (≥ moderate) AI at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were hemocompatibility-related adverse events, late right heart failure, aortic valve intervention (AVI), and mortality. A total of 170 HM3 patients were included: 27 with pre-LVAD mAFP and 143 without. Median age 58.9 years; 83.5% male; 37.6% White. More patients with pre-LVAD mAFP underwent AVI at implantation (22.9% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.130). At 1 year, significant AI was more prevalent in the mAFP group (22.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.003). In the propensity-matched cohort, 12 month significant AI was numerically higher with mAFP (20.8% vs. 5%, p = 0.198). Secondary outcomes did not differ. Pre-HM3 mAFP support is associated with higher rates of post-HM3 AI. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002762
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De Novo Aortic Insufficiency and Its Progression in Patients on Microaxial Flow Pump Support Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device

Suely Roman, Dor Lotan, B. Elad, Dávid Bea et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

De Novo Aortic Insufficiency and Its Progression in Patients on Microaxial Flow Pump Support Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device

Suely Roman, Dor Lotan, B. Elad, Dávid Bea, Karan Wats, Daniel Burkhoff, Gregory Marecki, Daniel Oren, A. Fernandez Valledor, Ilan Richter, Adham Elmously, Alexander Chui, Brian LaBarre, Jaya Batra, Julia Baranowska, Adi Hertz, Kevin Clerkin, Jayant Raikhelkar, Kyung T. Oh, Elissa Driggin, Adil Yunis, Justin Fried, Gabriel Sayer, Manreet Kanwar, Nir Uriel, Paolo C. Colombo, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Koji Takeda, Salwa Rahman
article en

Abstract

Aortic insufficiency (AI) is associated with worse outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Microaxial flow pumps (mAFP) are increasingly used to stabilize cardiogenic shock pre-LVAD, but their transvalvular nature raises concerns for valvular damage. We studied AI incidence and outcomes in HeartMate 3 (HM3) recipients supported by mAFP. A single-center retrospective analysis (2014-2023) compared HM3 recipients bridged with mAFP to those supported by inotropes or other mechanical circulatory support. A secondary analysis used a propensity-matched cohort. The primary outcome was the incidence of significant (≥ moderate) AI at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were hemocompatibility-related adverse events, late right heart failure, aortic valve intervention (AVI), and mortality. A total of 170 HM3 patients were included: 27 with pre-LVAD mAFP and 143 without. Median age 58.9 years; 83.5% male; 37.6% White. More patients with pre-LVAD mAFP underwent AVI at implantation (22.9% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.130). At 1 year, significant AI was more prevalent in the mAFP group (22.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.003). In the propensity-matched cohort, 12 month significant AI was numerically higher with mAFP (20.8% vs. 5%, p = 0.198). Secondary outcomes did not differ. Pre-HM3 mAFP support is associated with higher rates of post-HM3 AI. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.

ASAIO Journal
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Cornell University (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), University of Chicago (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Columbia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.