Deep Neuromuscular Blockade in Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: Optimal visibility during Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is challenging. This study compares moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) for surgical field quality, respiratory and hemodynamic outcomes, atelectasis rates, pain, and bowel recovery. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial involved adults with severe obesity (ASA II/III) undergoing OAGB with general anesthesia. Patients were assigned to deep or moderate NMB, monitored by acceleromyography. Surgical workspace quality was measured using the Leiden Surgical Rating Scale. Collected intraoperative data included workspace, operative time, pulmonary mechanics, hemodynamics, and oxygenation; postoperative outcomes covered pain scores, analgesic use, time to first flatus, complications, hospital stay, and atelectasis via chest CT. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included (moderate: n = 28; deep: n = 27), with comparable baseline characteristics. NMB depth did not affect pulmonary mechanics. Deep NMB significantly improved intraoperative surgical field conditions (p < 0.001) and reduced operative time by approximately 10 min, with regression analysis confirming an 11.5 - minute reduction (p = 0.044). Hemodynamics and oxygenation were similar between groups. Patients in the deep NMB group reported lower postoperative pain scores, but comparable analgesic consumption. Length of hospital stay (p = 0.879), and incidence of atelectasis (p = 0.831) did not differ between groups. No association was found between BMI, NMB depth, and postoperative atelectasis. CONCLUSIONS: Deep NMB improves surgical conditions and shortens operative time for laparoscopic OAGB at standard pneumoperitoneum pressure. While it reduced postoperative pain, fixed intra-abdominal pressure and opioid-based anesthesia may have limited assessment of other outcomes. Further studies using multimodal strategies are needed to assess its impact on recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Surgery
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08799-8
Primary Topic
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade in Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Randomized Controlled Trial

D. Aretha, Nikolas Drakos, George Skroubis, Stella Antoniou et al.
Obesity Surgery
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
article

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade in Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Randomized Controlled Trial

D. Aretha, Nikolas Drakos, George Skroubis, Stella Antoniou, Sofia Bregianni, Christina Kalogeropoulou, Ioannis D. Kostakis
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Optimal visibility during Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is challenging. This study compares moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) for surgical field quality, respiratory and hemodynamic outcomes, atelectasis rates, pain, and bowel recovery. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial involved adults with severe obesity (ASA II/III) undergoing OAGB with general anesthesia. Patients were assigned to deep or moderate NMB, monitored by acceleromyography. Surgical workspace quality was measured using the Leiden Surgical Rating Scale. Collected intraoperative data included workspace, operative time, pulmonary mechanics, hemodynamics, and oxygenation; postoperative outcomes covered pain scores, analgesic use, time to first flatus, complications, hospital stay, and atelectasis via chest CT. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included (moderate: n = 28; deep: n = 27), with comparable baseline characteristics. NMB depth did not affect pulmonary mechanics. Deep NMB significantly improved intraoperative surgical field conditions (p < 0.001) and reduced operative time by approximately 10 min, with regression analysis confirming an 11.5 - minute reduction (p = 0.044). Hemodynamics and oxygenation were similar between groups. Patients in the deep NMB group reported lower postoperative pain scores, but comparable analgesic consumption. Length of hospital stay (p = 0.879), and incidence of atelectasis (p = 0.831) did not differ between groups. No association was found between BMI, NMB depth, and postoperative atelectasis. CONCLUSIONS: Deep NMB improves surgical conditions and shortens operative time for laparoscopic OAGB at standard pneumoperitoneum pressure. While it reduced postoperative pain, fixed intra-abdominal pressure and opioid-based anesthesia may have limited assessment of other outcomes. Further studies using multimodal strategies are needed to assess its impact on recovery.

Obesity Surgery
University of Patras (GR)
University of Patras
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.