Towards an inclusive society and solid waste management system: Revealing waste pickers’ life preference and satisfaction in Indonesia

Abstract To realize an inclusive society, limited understanding of waste pickers’ preferences, alongside the absence of a consistent method for assessing those preferences and their variations, has constrained policy design to support them. This study introduces a combined approach using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Cantril Ladder, and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to examine Indonesian waste pickers’ priorities and their perceived satisfaction across seven life aspects. The findings suggest that, overall, waste pickers place greatest emphasis on their children’s education and on work safety, and report relatively high satisfaction for these life aspects. However, distinct patterns emerge, grouping waste pickers into three classes: (1) those oriented towards food security and sanitation; (2) those whose priorities reflect the general pattern but who report low satisfaction; and (3) those who share the general priorities but express high satisfaction. These differences show that a single, uniform policy is unlikely to be appropriate. Instead, interventions should be aligned with the needs of each class. By applying the methods and insights from this study, policies aimed at improving waste pickers’ living conditions and strengthening waste management systems (i.e., formalization of waste pickers) can be designed with greater precision and effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-026-02635-y
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an inclusive society and solid waste management system: Revealing waste pickers’ life preference and satisfaction in Indonesia

Athicha Uttajug, Elprida Agustina, Radhitiya Al Furqan, Naoya Abe
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Towards an inclusive society and solid waste management system: Revealing waste pickers’ life preference and satisfaction in Indonesia

Athicha Uttajug, Elprida Agustina, Radhitiya Al Furqan, Naoya Abe
article en

Abstract

Abstract To realize an inclusive society, limited understanding of waste pickers’ preferences, alongside the absence of a consistent method for assessing those preferences and their variations, has constrained policy design to support them. This study introduces a combined approach using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Cantril Ladder, and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to examine Indonesian waste pickers’ priorities and their perceived satisfaction across seven life aspects. The findings suggest that, overall, waste pickers place greatest emphasis on their children’s education and on work safety, and report relatively high satisfaction for these life aspects. However, distinct patterns emerge, grouping waste pickers into three classes: (1) those oriented towards food security and sanitation; (2) those whose priorities reflect the general pattern but who report low satisfaction; and (3) those who share the general priorities but express high satisfaction. These differences show that a single, uniform policy is unlikely to be appropriate. Instead, interventions should be aligned with the needs of each class. By applying the methods and insights from this study, policies aimed at improving waste pickers’ living conditions and strengthening waste management systems (i.e., formalization of waste pickers) can be designed with greater precision and effectiveness.

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Bandung Institute of Technology (ID), Tokyo University of Science (JP)
Heiwa Nakajima Foundation
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.