A comparison between early onset sepsis (EOS) risk calculator and modified new protocol in a newborn ≥ 35 weeks: a simulation study

BACKGROUND: Early onset sepsis (EOS) is a potentially fatal condition in neonates and its correct management is still a challenge for neonatologists. Early antibiotic administration in the neonatal period may carry risks and reducing unnecessary antibiotic therapy remains a key objective. It is well known that EOS risk calculator has reduced investigations and antibiotics for suspected EOS, but many limitations have been identified (e.g. strong value to respiratory symptoms, lack of standardized neonatal monitoring). To develop a new protocol, called Neosafe, for the management of newborn ≥ 35 weeks at risk of EOS based on the EOS risk calculator and serial physical examination with the aim of reducing blood investigations and unnecessary antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this single-center observational retrospective study 2000 Neonates ≥ 35 weeks were enrolled. A new protocol called Neosafe has been developed, which deviates from the original for two major changes: (1) different serial physical examination (SPE) recommendation for each risk situations (2) clinical scenario revisited with multiple signs. Comparison between Neosafe protocol and EOS risk calculator simulated data were performed using McNemar's test (statistical significance p < 0,05) and the Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess the degree of agreement among them. RESULTS: 48/2000 infants (2,4%) would have performed blood investigations versus 82/2000 (4,1%) whether Neosafe protocol would have been applied (p < 0,0001). 43/2000 infants (2,2%) with Neosafe protocol would have received antibiotics versus 80/2000 (4,0%) with EOS risk calculator (p < 0,0001). All infants who would not receive antibiotics for Neosafe protocol were infants with equivocal signs and isolated mild to moderate respiratory distress, but predisposed to advanced medical monitoring. Proven sepsis during the study period were 4, 2 of them were lost by both (no symptoms at birth, blood tests performed for non-infectious reasons). 1829 infants (91,5%) would receive routinal nursing SPE monitoring, 128 advanced medical SPE monitoring and 43 advanced medical SPE+vital for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). CONCLUSIONS: In our study Neosafe protocol could have reduced blood investigations and antibiotic therapy. Neosafe protocol could be a promising tool that integrates the use of digital technologies and direct attention to the patients. More trials are needed for further improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-026-02271-0
Primary Topic
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison between early onset sepsis (EOS) risk calculator and modified new protocol in a newborn ≥ 35 weeks: a simulation study

Massimo Agosti, Simona Perniciaro, Angela Bossi, Silvia Armiraglio
˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
article

A comparison between early onset sepsis (EOS) risk calculator and modified new protocol in a newborn ≥ 35 weeks: a simulation study

Massimo Agosti, Simona Perniciaro, Angela Bossi, Silvia Armiraglio
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early onset sepsis (EOS) is a potentially fatal condition in neonates and its correct management is still a challenge for neonatologists. Early antibiotic administration in the neonatal period may carry risks and reducing unnecessary antibiotic therapy remains a key objective. It is well known that EOS risk calculator has reduced investigations and antibiotics for suspected EOS, but many limitations have been identified (e.g. strong value to respiratory symptoms, lack of standardized neonatal monitoring). To develop a new protocol, called Neosafe, for the management of newborn ≥ 35 weeks at risk of EOS based on the EOS risk calculator and serial physical examination with the aim of reducing blood investigations and unnecessary antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this single-center observational retrospective study 2000 Neonates ≥ 35 weeks were enrolled. A new protocol called Neosafe has been developed, which deviates from the original for two major changes: (1) different serial physical examination (SPE) recommendation for each risk situations (2) clinical scenario revisited with multiple signs. Comparison between Neosafe protocol and EOS risk calculator simulated data were performed using McNemar's test (statistical significance p < 0,05) and the Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess the degree of agreement among them. RESULTS: 48/2000 infants (2,4%) would have performed blood investigations versus 82/2000 (4,1%) whether Neosafe protocol would have been applied (p < 0,0001). 43/2000 infants (2,2%) with Neosafe protocol would have received antibiotics versus 80/2000 (4,0%) with EOS risk calculator (p < 0,0001). All infants who would not receive antibiotics for Neosafe protocol were infants with equivocal signs and isolated mild to moderate respiratory distress, but predisposed to advanced medical monitoring. Proven sepsis during the study period were 4, 2 of them were lost by both (no symptoms at birth, blood tests performed for non-infectious reasons). 1829 infants (91,5%) would receive routinal nursing SPE monitoring, 128 advanced medical SPE monitoring and 43 advanced medical SPE+vital for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). CONCLUSIONS: In our study Neosafe protocol could have reduced blood investigations and antibiotic therapy. Neosafe protocol could be a promising tool that integrates the use of digital technologies and direct attention to the patients. More trials are needed for further improvements.

˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics
University of Insubria (IT), Ospedale Filippo Del Ponte Varese (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neonatal and Maternal Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.