Measuring causal strengths from spatial cross-sectional data with geographical cross mapping cardinality

Spatial cross-sectional data encapsulate rich information on spatial processes, forming a critical foundation for examining causation between variables. Detecting and quantifying such causation is essential for understanding complex natural and human phenomena. Measuring causal strengths from spatial cross sectional data, however, remains challenging, as existing methods often suffer from high false positive rates when quantifying causation. To address this gap, we propose a Geographical Cross Mapping Cardinality (GCMC) model that quantifies causal strength based on the intersectional cardinality of neighborhoods in reconstructed state space, and incorporates the DeLong placement method to evaluate the statistical significance of causal strength estimates. We validate GCMC using a simulated three variable causal benchmark and three representative spatial cross sectional datasets with known causal structures, and further assess its sensitivity to observational noise. Results demonstrate that GCMC effectively captures causation across weak, moderate, and strong coupling regimes while maintaining a low false positive rate and robust performance under noise. As a new extension of empirical dynamic modeling for spatial cross sectional data, GCMC complements existing methods and enables more reliable spatial causal inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2026.2687121
Primary Topic
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring causal strengths from spatial cross-sectional data with geographical cross mapping cardinality

Nan Jia, Shaoqing Dai, Yongze Song, Wenbo Lv et al.
International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
article

Measuring causal strengths from spatial cross-sectional data with geographical cross mapping cardinality

Nan Jia, Shaoqing Dai, Yongze Song, Wenbo Lv, Yumiao Xiao, Wen Yi, Wufan Zhao
article en

Abstract

Spatial cross-sectional data encapsulate rich information on spatial processes, forming a critical foundation for examining causation between variables. Detecting and quantifying such causation is essential for understanding complex natural and human phenomena. Measuring causal strengths from spatial cross sectional data, however, remains challenging, as existing methods often suffer from high false positive rates when quantifying causation. To address this gap, we propose a Geographical Cross Mapping Cardinality (GCMC) model that quantifies causal strength based on the intersectional cardinality of neighborhoods in reconstructed state space, and incorporates the DeLong placement method to evaluate the statistical significance of causal strength estimates. We validate GCMC using a simulated three variable causal benchmark and three representative spatial cross sectional datasets with known causal structures, and further assess its sensitivity to observational noise. Results demonstrate that GCMC effectively captures causation across weak, moderate, and strong coupling regimes while maintaining a low false positive rate and robust performance under noise. As a new extension of empirical dynamic modeling for spatial cross sectional data, GCMC complements existing methods and enables more reliable spatial causal inference.

International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Institute on Governance (CA), Michigan Department of Natural Resources (US), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Shenzhen Polytechnic University (CN), Curtin University (AU), Wuhan University (CN), Faculty of Design (SI), Michigan State University (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.