FINANCING SUSTAINABILITY: ASSESSING EU GREEN FINANCING INSTRUMENTS

This article analyses the role of the European Union’s LIFE Clean Energy Transition (CET) programme in shaping patterns of small and medium-size enterprise (SME) participation in the green transition. The study applies a comparative approach, examining CET projects implemented in Lithuania and Germany during the period 2021 to 2024. The analysis focuses on project distribution, funding volumes, institutional composition, thematic scope, and SME involvement. The findings reveal significant differences between the two countries. Germany demonstrates a larger and more diverse project portfolio, with SMEs actively participating in technologically oriented and governance-related initiatives. In contrast, Lithuania’s participation remains more limited, and is concentrated primarily in capacity-building activities, with SMEs playing a more indirect role. The results indicate that the effectiveness of EU green policy instruments depends on national institutional capacity, innovation infrastructure, and administrative experience. The study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative empirical analysis of the LIFE CET programme, and highlighting uneven outcomes of EU green policy implementation across Member States.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tiltai
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15181/tbb.v96i1.2800
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FINANCING SUSTAINABILITY: ASSESSING EU GREEN FINANCING INSTRUMENTS

Robertas Eismontas
Tiltai
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

FINANCING SUSTAINABILITY: ASSESSING EU GREEN FINANCING INSTRUMENTS

Robertas Eismontas
article en

Abstract

This article analyses the role of the European Union’s LIFE Clean Energy Transition (CET) programme in shaping patterns of small and medium-size enterprise (SME) participation in the green transition. The study applies a comparative approach, examining CET projects implemented in Lithuania and Germany during the period 2021 to 2024. The analysis focuses on project distribution, funding volumes, institutional composition, thematic scope, and SME involvement. The findings reveal significant differences between the two countries. Germany demonstrates a larger and more diverse project portfolio, with SMEs actively participating in technologically oriented and governance-related initiatives. In contrast, Lithuania’s participation remains more limited, and is concentrated primarily in capacity-building activities, with SMEs playing a more indirect role. The results indicate that the effectiveness of EU green policy instruments depends on national institutional capacity, innovation infrastructure, and administrative experience. The study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative empirical analysis of the LIFE CET programme, and highlighting uneven outcomes of EU green policy implementation across Member States.

Tiltai
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.