Facial emotion recognition, insight and social functioning in first episode psychosis: a cross-sectional study from an observational cohort

BACKGROUND: First-episode psychosis (FEP) is a critical stage in psychotic disorders, in terms of clinical and functional outcome. Deficits in facial emotion recognition and impaired clinical insight have been linked to poorer functioning, but their combined role remains unclear. This study examined whether insight impairment moderates the association between facial emotion recognition and personal and social functioning in FEP. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Athens FEP Research Study and analyzed cross-sectionally at the one-month follow-up. After applying the BFRT ≥ 20 criterion, the analytic sample comprised 175 participants. Facial emotion recognition was assessed with the Degraded Facial Affect Recognition task (DFAR), insight impairment with PANSS item G12, and functioning with the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). The primary outcome was PSP total score; PSP domain scores were treated as exploratory outcomes. Separate moderation models were estimated for each DFAR index and PSP outcome, adjusting for age, gender, Full Scale IQ, and PANSS negative symptoms. Missing data were handled with multiple imputation by chained equations (50 imputations), and pooled estimates were calculated using Rubin's rules. Complete-case analyses served as sensitivity checks. False discovery rate correction was applied to interaction p-values, and effect sizes were reported as ΔR² and Cohen's f². RESULTS: For the primary outcome (PSP total score), none of the interactions between insight impairment and the DFAR indices reached nominal significance. Among exploratory outcomes, only the CorrectNeutral × insight impairment interaction for PSP disturbing/aggressive behavior reached nominal significance (β = 0.671, SE = 0.276, p = 0.015, ΔR² = 0.0335, f² = 0.0378), but it did not survive correction for multiple testing. Insight impairment and negative symptoms showed more consistent associations with poorer functioning than facial emotion recognition. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support a moderating effect of insight on the association between facial emotion recognition and functioning in FEP. Poorer insight and greater negative symptom severity were more consistently associated with worse functioning than facial emotion recognition itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08287-4
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial emotion recognition, insight and social functioning in first episode psychosis: a cross-sectional study from an observational cohort

Stefania Foteli, Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, George Konstantakopoulos, Alex Hatzimanolis et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Facial emotion recognition, insight and social functioning in first episode psychosis: a cross-sectional study from an observational cohort

Stefania Foteli, Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, George Konstantakopoulos, Alex Hatzimanolis, Mirjana Selaković, Nikos C. Stefanis, Konstantinos Kollias, Rigas Filippos Soldatos, Stefanos Dimitrakopoulos, Nikos Nianiakas, Marina Voulgaraki, Lida‐Alkisti Xenaki, Ioannis Kosteletos, Eirini Ralli, Aggeliki Ntigridaki, Ilias I. Vlachos, Stratis Alexandrou, Evaggelia Psara, Theoni-Fani Triantafyllou, Leonidas Mantonakis
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-episode psychosis (FEP) is a critical stage in psychotic disorders, in terms of clinical and functional outcome. Deficits in facial emotion recognition and impaired clinical insight have been linked to poorer functioning, but their combined role remains unclear. This study examined whether insight impairment moderates the association between facial emotion recognition and personal and social functioning in FEP. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Athens FEP Research Study and analyzed cross-sectionally at the one-month follow-up. After applying the BFRT ≥ 20 criterion, the analytic sample comprised 175 participants. Facial emotion recognition was assessed with the Degraded Facial Affect Recognition task (DFAR), insight impairment with PANSS item G12, and functioning with the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). The primary outcome was PSP total score; PSP domain scores were treated as exploratory outcomes. Separate moderation models were estimated for each DFAR index and PSP outcome, adjusting for age, gender, Full Scale IQ, and PANSS negative symptoms. Missing data were handled with multiple imputation by chained equations (50 imputations), and pooled estimates were calculated using Rubin's rules. Complete-case analyses served as sensitivity checks. False discovery rate correction was applied to interaction p-values, and effect sizes were reported as ΔR² and Cohen's f². RESULTS: For the primary outcome (PSP total score), none of the interactions between insight impairment and the DFAR indices reached nominal significance. Among exploratory outcomes, only the CorrectNeutral × insight impairment interaction for PSP disturbing/aggressive behavior reached nominal significance (β = 0.671, SE = 0.276, p = 0.015, ΔR² = 0.0335, f² = 0.0378), but it did not survive correction for multiple testing. Insight impairment and negative symptoms showed more consistent associations with poorer functioning than facial emotion recognition. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support a moderating effect of insight on the association between facial emotion recognition and functioning in FEP. Poorer insight and greater negative symptom severity were more consistently associated with worse functioning than facial emotion recognition itself.

BMC Psychiatry
University of Peloponnese (GR), National Technical University of Athens (GR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), 401 General Military Hospital of Athens (GR), Eginition Hospital (GR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.