Trans-tarsal stair-step versus transconjunctival approach in orbito-zygomaticomaxillary fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been proposed for treating orbito-zygomaticomaxillary fractures, each with distinct benefits and drawbacks. AIM OF THIS STUDY: To compare Trans-tarsal Stair-Step Lateral Extension of the Transconjunctival approach with transconjunctival approach combined with lateral eyebrow incision in the management of orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with respect to accessibility to fracture site and exposure duration as primary aims. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients, aged between 18 and 60 years, who has orbito-zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures were randomly assigned to two equal groups: Group A underwent the trans-tarsal stair-step lateral extension of the transconjunctival approach and Group B received the conventional transconjunctival approach combined with lateral eyebrow incision. Intraoperative parameters which were accessibility to fracture site, exposure duration and total operative time and postoperative parameters which were postoperative edema, postoperative scar and esthetic appearance, postoperative pain and infraorbital sensory nerve function objectively, all were assessed. RESULTS: Group A achieved same surgical access to the fracture site as Group B. Group A and group B had same exposure time. Group A had less total operative time than Group B. Group A consistently showed the less postoperative edema at first 48 h, one week, and four weeks. Non noticeable scarring was reported only in Group A patients while group B had a noticeable scar at the lateral eyebrow incision. Within the first 24 h, there was significant difference in pain levels that was noted between the two groups. Group A had faster recovery in sensory nerve function than group B. CONCLUSION: The trans-tarsal stair-step lateral extension of the transconjunctival approach demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes regarding pain, edema, and sensory recovery compared to the conventional technique with lateral eyebrow incision with same exposure area and no increase in exposure time and less total operative time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT07044258) on 19-6-2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08842-1
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trans-tarsal stair-step versus transconjunctival approach in orbito-zygomaticomaxillary fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Amany M. Alryess, Marwa G. Noureldin, Noha Y. Dessoky, David Emad Sobhy
BMC Oral Health
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Trans-tarsal stair-step versus transconjunctival approach in orbito-zygomaticomaxillary fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Amany M. Alryess, Marwa G. Noureldin, Noha Y. Dessoky, David Emad Sobhy
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been proposed for treating orbito-zygomaticomaxillary fractures, each with distinct benefits and drawbacks. AIM OF THIS STUDY: To compare Trans-tarsal Stair-Step Lateral Extension of the Transconjunctival approach with transconjunctival approach combined with lateral eyebrow incision in the management of orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with respect to accessibility to fracture site and exposure duration as primary aims. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients, aged between 18 and 60 years, who has orbito-zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures were randomly assigned to two equal groups: Group A underwent the trans-tarsal stair-step lateral extension of the transconjunctival approach and Group B received the conventional transconjunctival approach combined with lateral eyebrow incision. Intraoperative parameters which were accessibility to fracture site, exposure duration and total operative time and postoperative parameters which were postoperative edema, postoperative scar and esthetic appearance, postoperative pain and infraorbital sensory nerve function objectively, all were assessed. RESULTS: Group A achieved same surgical access to the fracture site as Group B. Group A and group B had same exposure time. Group A had less total operative time than Group B. Group A consistently showed the less postoperative edema at first 48 h, one week, and four weeks. Non noticeable scarring was reported only in Group A patients while group B had a noticeable scar at the lateral eyebrow incision. Within the first 24 h, there was significant difference in pain levels that was noted between the two groups. Group A had faster recovery in sensory nerve function than group B. CONCLUSION: The trans-tarsal stair-step lateral extension of the transconjunctival approach demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes regarding pain, edema, and sensory recovery compared to the conventional technique with lateral eyebrow incision with same exposure area and no increase in exposure time and less total operative time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT07044258) on 19-6-2025.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Alexandria University (EG)
Alexandria University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.