Concordance of <scp>HbA1c</scp> , creatinine, <scp>LDL</scp> cholesterol, <scp>HDL</scp> cholesterol, and total cholesterol between venous and self‐collected capillary blood samples sent by mail

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Self-collected capillary blood sampling with postal shipment may improve access to routine monitoring of HbA1c, creatinine, and lipid parameters, but evidence on concordance with venous samples under real-world transport conditions remains limited. This study evaluated the concordance of HbA1c, creatinine, and lipid parameters between self-collected mailed capillary samples, mailed venous samples, and courier-transported venous samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, participants scheduled for a blood draw in a general practice office self-collected a capillary blood sample using the Tasso+ device and provided additional venous blood samples. One venous sample was sent by mail (VMS) with the capillary blood sample (CMS). The other venous sample was couriered directly to the laboratory (VCS). HbA1c, creatinine, LDL, HDL, and total cholesterol were measured. RESULTS: Samples of 105 participants were analyzed. High concordance was observed between CMS and VCS for HbA1c (absolute mean bias = 0.028%, relative mean bias = 0.463%, concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] = 0.999) and creatinine (absolute mean bias = 0.037 mg/dL, relative mean bias = 4.815%, CCC = 0.972). VMS showed high agreement with VCS for HbA1c (absolute mean bias = 0.028%, relative mean bias = 0.450%, CCC = 0.998) and creatinine (absolute mean bias = 0.026 mg/dL, relative mean bias = 3.320%, CCC = 0.990). Lipid parameters demonstrated good concordance for CMS and VMS compared to VCS, with relative bias values ranging from 3.0% to 5.7% and CCCs >0.95. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collected mailed capillary blood samples provide comparable HbA1c, creatinine, and lipid parameters to venous samples, even when sent by standard mail. Capillary self-sampling is a reliable method for remote monitoring of these parameters in diabetes management and screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70359
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concordance of HbA1c , creatinine, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol between venous and self‐collected capillary blood samples sent by mail

Georg M. N. Behrens, Julie Schanz, Alexandra Dopfer‐Jablonka, Frank Müller et al.
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Concordance of HbA1c , creatinine, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol between venous and self‐collected capillary blood samples sent by mail

Georg M. N. Behrens, Julie Schanz, Alexandra Dopfer‐Jablonka, Frank Müller, Christine Happle, Dominik Schröder, Eva Hummers, Andrea Stölting, Christopher Schuchardt, Angelika Hafke, Linda Hoffmeister, Louis Kuhnke
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Self-collected capillary blood sampling with postal shipment may improve access to routine monitoring of HbA1c, creatinine, and lipid parameters, but evidence on concordance with venous samples under real-world transport conditions remains limited. This study evaluated the concordance of HbA1c, creatinine, and lipid parameters between self-collected mailed capillary samples, mailed venous samples, and courier-transported venous samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, participants scheduled for a blood draw in a general practice office self-collected a capillary blood sample using the Tasso+ device and provided additional venous blood samples. One venous sample was sent by mail (VMS) with the capillary blood sample (CMS). The other venous sample was couriered directly to the laboratory (VCS). HbA1c, creatinine, LDL, HDL, and total cholesterol were measured. RESULTS: Samples of 105 participants were analyzed. High concordance was observed between CMS and VCS for HbA1c (absolute mean bias = 0.028%, relative mean bias = 0.463%, concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] = 0.999) and creatinine (absolute mean bias = 0.037 mg/dL, relative mean bias = 4.815%, CCC = 0.972). VMS showed high agreement with VCS for HbA1c (absolute mean bias = 0.028%, relative mean bias = 0.450%, CCC = 0.998) and creatinine (absolute mean bias = 0.026 mg/dL, relative mean bias = 3.320%, CCC = 0.990). Lipid parameters demonstrated good concordance for CMS and VMS compared to VCS, with relative bias values ranging from 3.0% to 5.7% and CCCs >0.95. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collected mailed capillary blood samples provide comparable HbA1c, creatinine, and lipid parameters to venous samples, even when sent by standard mail. Capillary self-sampling is a reliable method for remote monitoring of these parameters in diabetes management and screening.

Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), German Center for Infection Research (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Lakeland Library Cooperative (US), German Center for Lung Research (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Michigan State University (US)
European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.