Early Detection of Keratoconus Using Corneal Tomography Image Analysis by GPT-5.4

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and limitations of a general-purpose multimodal large language model (GPT-5.4) in detecting early keratoconus (KC) using corneal tomography images. METHODS: This retrospective study included 66 eyes: 15 with subclinical KC, 18 with forme fruste keratoconus (ffKC), and 33 normal controls. Control eyes were obtained from refractive surgery candidates with normal corneas. For each eye, a standardized four-map Pentacam tomography image was analyzed using GPT-5.4 (OpenAI) with a predefined prompt. Only images were provided, without clinical or demographic data. Diagnostic performance for detecting early KC was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: GPT-5.4 demonstrated low sensitivity (30.3%) and high specificity (100%) for detecting early KC, with an overall accuracy of 65.2% and an area under the ROC curve of 0.65. The model showed a strong tendency to classify eyes as normal, resulting in a high rate of false-negative classifications. Multiclass analysis revealed a stage-dependent performance pattern, with excellent classification of normal corneas (100%), moderate detection of subclinical KC (53.3%), and poor detection of ffKC (11.1%), with most ffKC cases misclassified as normal. CONCLUSIONS: GPT-5.4 demonstrates high specificity but limited sensitivity for detecting early KC using image-only input and is not a reliable diagnostic or screening tool in its current form.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cornea
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000004230
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Detection of Keratoconus Using Corneal Tomography Image Analysis by GPT-5.4

Olga Reitblat, Jacob Megreli, Eitan Livny, Ruti Sella et al.
Cornea
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Early Detection of Keratoconus Using Corneal Tomography Image Analysis by GPT-5.4

Olga Reitblat, Jacob Megreli, Eitan Livny, Ruti Sella, Irit Bahar, Yoav Nahum, Noa Kapelushnik, Daniela Kamar
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and limitations of a general-purpose multimodal large language model (GPT-5.4) in detecting early keratoconus (KC) using corneal tomography images. METHODS: This retrospective study included 66 eyes: 15 with subclinical KC, 18 with forme fruste keratoconus (ffKC), and 33 normal controls. Control eyes were obtained from refractive surgery candidates with normal corneas. For each eye, a standardized four-map Pentacam tomography image was analyzed using GPT-5.4 (OpenAI) with a predefined prompt. Only images were provided, without clinical or demographic data. Diagnostic performance for detecting early KC was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: GPT-5.4 demonstrated low sensitivity (30.3%) and high specificity (100%) for detecting early KC, with an overall accuracy of 65.2% and an area under the ROC curve of 0.65. The model showed a strong tendency to classify eyes as normal, resulting in a high rate of false-negative classifications. Multiclass analysis revealed a stage-dependent performance pattern, with excellent classification of normal corneas (100%), moderate detection of subclinical KC (53.3%), and poor detection of ffKC (11.1%), with most ffKC cases misclassified as normal. CONCLUSIONS: GPT-5.4 demonstrates high specificity but limited sensitivity for detecting early KC using image-only input and is not a reliable diagnostic or screening tool in its current form.

Cornea
Tel Aviv University (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.