Import spillovers and innovation efficiency: the role of intellectual property protection in China

This paper examines how import spillovers affect innovation efficiency across different innovation contexts in China by using a Chinese regional panel dataset from 2001 to 2020. The results indicate the coexistent of two opposing mechanisms of import spillovers: learning effects and adverse crowd-out effects. The import spillovers positively affect R&D efficiency and IPR protection positively moderates the relationship between import spillovers and R&D efficiency. Moreover, IPR and R&D efficiency present an inverted U-shaped relationship. By contrast, import spillovers negatively affect commercialization efficiency and IPR protection negatively moderates the relationship between import spillovers and commercialization efficiency. There is significant heterogeneity impact in different regions. These findings contribute to understanding the impact of IPR protection on innovation in emerging markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2026.2673731
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Import spillovers and innovation efficiency: the role of intellectual property protection in China

Zhiyong Li, Gaojiong Wu, Juan Tu, Kaicheng Zhao et al.
Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Import spillovers and innovation efficiency: the role of intellectual property protection in China

Zhiyong Li, Gaojiong Wu, Juan Tu, Kaicheng Zhao, Zhiying Liu
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how import spillovers affect innovation efficiency across different innovation contexts in China by using a Chinese regional panel dataset from 2001 to 2020. The results indicate the coexistent of two opposing mechanisms of import spillovers: learning effects and adverse crowd-out effects. The import spillovers positively affect R&D efficiency and IPR protection positively moderates the relationship between import spillovers and R&D efficiency. Moreover, IPR and R&D efficiency present an inverted U-shaped relationship. By contrast, import spillovers negatively affect commercialization efficiency and IPR protection negatively moderates the relationship between import spillovers and commercialization efficiency. There is significant heterogeneity impact in different regions. These findings contribute to understanding the impact of IPR protection on innovation in emerging markets.

Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Import spillovers and innovation efficiency: the role of intellectual property protection in China — Zhiyong Li, Gaojiong Wu, et al. · Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS