Target occlusion and the confusion effect

Abstract One benefit for prey species living in groups is that predators find it harder to track and target individuals as aggregation size (or density) increases. While this ‘confusion effect’ is known to increase with factors such as object similarity and motion unpredictability, occlusion has received little empirical attention. This is despite the likelihood of a predator’s view of a target being obstructed by other group members moving in three-dimensional space. Using humans as surrogate predators in a computer-based visual search task, we tested how occlusion interacts with group size, target–distractor similarity and motion speed to affect the time to locate a target. Occlusion significantly increased the confusion effect, but only when the target was difficult to distinguish from distractors. When targets ‘popped out’ visually, occlusion had little or no effect, and search efficiency remained high. Surprisingly, motion did not modulate the confusion effect, at least at the tested speeds, and confusion was evident even in static objects. Overall, this implies that occlusion enhances confusion primarily by disrupting target re-identification when visual similarity is high, highlighting occlusion as an important but context-dependent factor in predator–prey interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.260483
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Target occlusion and the confusion effect

Innes C. Cuthill, Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel, Freya B. Ustianowski
Royal Society Open Science
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Target occlusion and the confusion effect

Innes C. Cuthill, Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel, Freya B. Ustianowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract One benefit for prey species living in groups is that predators find it harder to track and target individuals as aggregation size (or density) increases. While this ‘confusion effect’ is known to increase with factors such as object similarity and motion unpredictability, occlusion has received little empirical attention. This is despite the likelihood of a predator’s view of a target being obstructed by other group members moving in three-dimensional space. Using humans as surrogate predators in a computer-based visual search task, we tested how occlusion interacts with group size, target–distractor similarity and motion speed to affect the time to locate a target. Occlusion significantly increased the confusion effect, but only when the target was difficult to distinguish from distractors. When targets ‘popped out’ visually, occlusion had little or no effect, and search efficiency remained high. Surprisingly, motion did not modulate the confusion effect, at least at the tested speeds, and confusion was evident even in static objects. Overall, this implies that occlusion enhances confusion primarily by disrupting target re-identification when visual similarity is high, highlighting occlusion as an important but context-dependent factor in predator–prey interactions.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(6)
University of Bristol (GB)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.