Robust Hyperspectral Estimation of Winter Wheat Aboveground Dry Biomass Using CARS-UVE Band Selection and Transfer-Oriented Validation

Field hyperspectral sensing can estimate crop biomass, but model ranking may depend strongly on validation design. We evaluated winter wheat aboveground dry biomass (AGDB) estimation using 84 canopy spectra collected across two growing seasons and seven nitrogen-management treatments in Shanxi, China. Six spectral inputs were compared with CARS-UVE band selection, partial least squares regression (PLSR), and support vector regression (SVR). Under a conventional 70/30 pooled split, SG + CARS-UVE + SVR gave the highest apparent accuracy (R2 = 0.8864, RMSE = 0.1174 kg m−2, RPD = 2.9665). This advantage was not stable. Across 20 SG-based repeated splits, CARS-UVE-SVR reached a mean R2 of 0.7413 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.6941–0.7885, similar to full-band PLSR (0.7448, 0.7058–0.7837), and pairwise tests showed no significant R2 advantage. Cross-year transfer further favored simpler latent-variable models: SG + CARS-UVE + PLSR reached R2 = 0.7577 in the 2021 → 2022 direction, whereas the pooled best SVR model dropped to R2 = 0.3402. A stricter same-window cross-year analysis produced weak or negative R2 values, showing that broad phenological biomass gradients supported much of the pooled accuracy. Recurrent selected regions occurred near 436–441 nm, 506–516 nm, and 711–713 nm. These findings suggest that repeated and transfer-oriented validation should be used routinely before hyperspectral biomass models are interpreted for cross-season crop monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121997
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust Hyperspectral Estimation of Winter Wheat Aboveground Dry Biomass Using CARS-UVE Band Selection and Transfer-Oriented Validation

Yu Chen, Meichen Feng, Sha Yang, Yi Wang et al.
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Robust Hyperspectral Estimation of Winter Wheat Aboveground Dry Biomass Using CARS-UVE Band Selection and Transfer-Oriented Validation

Yu Chen, Meichen Feng, Sha Yang, Yi Wang, Juan Bai, Guangxin Li, Wude Yang, Shiyou Zhu
article en

Abstract

Field hyperspectral sensing can estimate crop biomass, but model ranking may depend strongly on validation design. We evaluated winter wheat aboveground dry biomass (AGDB) estimation using 84 canopy spectra collected across two growing seasons and seven nitrogen-management treatments in Shanxi, China. Six spectral inputs were compared with CARS-UVE band selection, partial least squares regression (PLSR), and support vector regression (SVR). Under a conventional 70/30 pooled split, SG + CARS-UVE + SVR gave the highest apparent accuracy (R2 = 0.8864, RMSE = 0.1174 kg m−2, RPD = 2.9665). This advantage was not stable. Across 20 SG-based repeated splits, CARS-UVE-SVR reached a mean R2 of 0.7413 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.6941–0.7885, similar to full-band PLSR (0.7448, 0.7058–0.7837), and pairwise tests showed no significant R2 advantage. Cross-year transfer further favored simpler latent-variable models: SG + CARS-UVE + PLSR reached R2 = 0.7577 in the 2021 → 2022 direction, whereas the pooled best SVR model dropped to R2 = 0.3402. A stricter same-window cross-year analysis produced weak or negative R2 values, showing that broad phenological biomass gradients supported much of the pooled accuracy. Recurrent selected regions occurred near 436–441 nm, 506–516 nm, and 711–713 nm. These findings suggest that repeated and transfer-oriented validation should be used routinely before hyperspectral biomass models are interpreted for cross-season crop monitoring.

Remote SensingVol. 18(12)
Shanxi Agricultural University (CN), Cotton Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.