Assessing the inclusion of persons with disabilities in climate adaptation policy planning in Ghana: a document review

Climate change disproportionately affects persons with disabilities (PWDs), yet adaptation policies persistently neglect their specific needs. This study examines the integration of climate justice into adaptation policies affecting PWDs from 2011 to 2022, applying Schlosberg’s framework of distributional, procedural, and recognitional justice. Findings reveal critical gaps across all three dimensions: PWDs are systematically excluded from policy-making processes (procedural); no targeted resources are allocated for disability-specific adaptation (distributional); and PWDs are subsumed under broad “vulnerable groups” categories rather than recognized explicitly (recognitional). These omissions reinforce systemic inequalities and undermine inclusive climate resilience. The study argues that policymakers must adopt rights-based, inclusive approaches ensuring PWDs’ active participation, dedicating disability-specific funding, and strengthening disaggregated data collection to advance equitable and effective climate adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-026-00396-w
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the inclusion of persons with disabilities in climate adaptation policy planning in Ghana: a document review

Sulemana Mumuni, Felix Dordaa, Frederick Dapilah
npj Climate Action
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Assessing the inclusion of persons with disabilities in climate adaptation policy planning in Ghana: a document review

Sulemana Mumuni, Felix Dordaa, Frederick Dapilah
article en

Abstract

Climate change disproportionately affects persons with disabilities (PWDs), yet adaptation policies persistently neglect their specific needs. This study examines the integration of climate justice into adaptation policies affecting PWDs from 2011 to 2022, applying Schlosberg’s framework of distributional, procedural, and recognitional justice. Findings reveal critical gaps across all three dimensions: PWDs are systematically excluded from policy-making processes (procedural); no targeted resources are allocated for disability-specific adaptation (distributional); and PWDs are subsumed under broad “vulnerable groups” categories rather than recognized explicitly (recognitional). These omissions reinforce systemic inequalities and undermine inclusive climate resilience. The study argues that policymakers must adopt rights-based, inclusive approaches ensuring PWDs’ active participation, dedicating disability-specific funding, and strengthening disaggregated data collection to advance equitable and effective climate adaptation.

npj Climate Action
University for Development Studies (GH)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.