Forest biomass harvesting operations’ costs and production rates in the Florida Coastal Plain: a case study of two sites

As biomass energy becomes a key part of the renewable energy mix, optimizing biomass harvesting operations is crucial for ensuring efficiency, economic viability, and a sustainable energy supply. This study analyzed two biomass harvesting operations in the Coastal Plain of Florida, each employing rubber-tired feller-bunchers, grapple skidders, trailer-mounted knuckleboom loaders, and whole-tree woodchippers. While both operations produced wood chips, Operation A harvested material from a stand dominated by small-diameter trees, whereas Operation B harvested understory and unmerchantable trees from a mixed stand where merchantable stems were handled separately. The average productivity rates per productive machine hour (PMH) were 17 green tonnes for the feller-bunchers, 38 green tonnes for the skidders, and 64 green tonnes for the chippers. Low productivity of the feller-bunchers was attributed to the small diameter of harvested trees, with over 60% having a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 7.6 cm or less. Despite chippers having a low utilization rate (58.5%), feller-buncher capacity ultimately constrained overall system productivity. Chipping was the most expensive activity at $USD 105 per scheduled machine hour (SMH), followed by felling ($USD 102), skidding ($USD 98), and loading ($USD 92). Compared with the 2020 TimberMart-South Coastal Plain final-harvest cut-and-load reference rate of $USD 12.5 per tonne, biomass cut-and-load rates were $USD 2.3 higher in Operation A and USD $5.1 per tonne higher in Operation B, with lower costs in Operation A due to higher productivity. This study provides valuable insights into improving the economic efficiency and operational productivity of biomass harvesting systems while supporting the sustainable development of biomass energy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forest Engineering
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2026.2686907
Primary Topic
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest biomass harvesting operations’ costs and production rates in the Florida Coastal Plain: a case study of two sites

Mandira Pokharel, Richard Cristan, Manisha Parajuli, Aihua Yu et al.
International Journal of Forest Engineering
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
article

Forest biomass harvesting operations’ costs and production rates in the Florida Coastal Plain: a case study of two sites

Mandira Pokharel, Richard Cristan, Manisha Parajuli, Aihua Yu, Dana Mitchell, Thomas Gallagher, Luke Chasuk, Marissa “Jo” Daniel
article en

Abstract

As biomass energy becomes a key part of the renewable energy mix, optimizing biomass harvesting operations is crucial for ensuring efficiency, economic viability, and a sustainable energy supply. This study analyzed two biomass harvesting operations in the Coastal Plain of Florida, each employing rubber-tired feller-bunchers, grapple skidders, trailer-mounted knuckleboom loaders, and whole-tree woodchippers. While both operations produced wood chips, Operation A harvested material from a stand dominated by small-diameter trees, whereas Operation B harvested understory and unmerchantable trees from a mixed stand where merchantable stems were handled separately. The average productivity rates per productive machine hour (PMH) were 17 green tonnes for the feller-bunchers, 38 green tonnes for the skidders, and 64 green tonnes for the chippers. Low productivity of the feller-bunchers was attributed to the small diameter of harvested trees, with over 60% having a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 7.6 cm or less. Despite chippers having a low utilization rate (58.5%), feller-buncher capacity ultimately constrained overall system productivity. Chipping was the most expensive activity at $USD 105 per scheduled machine hour (SMH), followed by felling ($USD 102), skidding ($USD 98), and loading ($USD 92). Compared with the 2020 TimberMart-South Coastal Plain final-harvest cut-and-load reference rate of $USD 12.5 per tonne, biomass cut-and-load rates were $USD 2.3 higher in Operation A and USD $5.1 per tonne higher in Operation B, with lower costs in Operation A due to higher productivity. This study provides valuable insights into improving the economic efficiency and operational productivity of biomass harvesting systems while supporting the sustainable development of biomass energy.

International Journal of Forest Engineering
Nanjing Forestry University (CN), BEST - Bioenergy and Sustainable Technologies (Austria) (AT), Department of Forestry (MW), Bioenergy Life Science (United States) (US), Kentucky State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.