Translational perspectives on neurophysiological responses and mechanisms in blood flow restriction exercise

Maintaining corticospinal tract function is crucial for voluntary movement. Exercise using high external loads/intensities is a promising intervention to promote adaptations to the corticospinal tract and improve physical function; however, such loads/intensities may not be tolerable or safe in populations with neurological disorders, motor-impaired injuries and older adults. Exercise using low external loads/intensities with blood flow restriction offers an alternative that provides comparable adaptations in muscular hypertrophy, strength and function (e.g., gait performance) to higher external-load/intensity exercise. Although some data suggest that blood flow restriction exercise may induce neuroplasticity, the neurophysiological responses remain largely unknown. Given the potential significance of blood flow restriction exercise for clinical populations, this review synthesises available data and potential mechanisms of these neuroplastic responses while providing translational insights and future research recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Physiology
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/ep093587
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translational perspectives on neurophysiological responses and mechanisms in blood flow restriction exercise

Paul S.R. Goods, K. Fox, Luke Hughes, Brendan R. Scott et al.
Experimental Physiology
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Translational perspectives on neurophysiological responses and mechanisms in blood flow restriction exercise

Paul S.R. Goods, K. Fox, Luke Hughes, Brendan R. Scott, Ann‐Maree Vallence, Shaun Y. M. Teo
article en

Abstract

Maintaining corticospinal tract function is crucial for voluntary movement. Exercise using high external loads/intensities is a promising intervention to promote adaptations to the corticospinal tract and improve physical function; however, such loads/intensities may not be tolerable or safe in populations with neurological disorders, motor-impaired injuries and older adults. Exercise using low external loads/intensities with blood flow restriction offers an alternative that provides comparable adaptations in muscular hypertrophy, strength and function (e.g., gait performance) to higher external-load/intensity exercise. Although some data suggest that blood flow restriction exercise may induce neuroplasticity, the neurophysiological responses remain largely unknown. Given the potential significance of blood flow restriction exercise for clinical populations, this review synthesises available data and potential mechanisms of these neuroplastic responses while providing translational insights and future research recommendations.

Experimental Physiology
Murdoch University (AU), Northumbria University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Translational perspectives on neurophysiological responses and mechanisms in blood flow restriction exercise — Paul S.R. Goods, K. Fox, et al. · Experimental Physiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS