Narratives on solitary confinement and Italian ‘primacy’ in transatlantic perspective (eighteenth–nineteenth century)

This article examines the role of the Catholic and Italian legacy in the transnational public debate on prison reform during the first half of the nineteenth century. The hegemony of the Philadelphia model of ‘solitary confinement’ in contemporary discourse has long obscured the connections between this model and the ‘cellular confinement’ experiments of eighteenth-century Italian states, particularly the houses of correction in Milan and Rome.The emergence of a narrative asserting an Italian – later specifically Roman – ‘primacy’ in the origins of penal confinement developed across different punitive contexts and regimes, including Protestant and Catholic European networks as well as American Quakers. The invocation of Italian precedents relied on a range of rhetorical strategies aimed at legitimizing the ‘modern penitentiary’.Focusing on the synchronicity and circulation of texts (essays, travel accounts, and newspaper articles) the article highlights the adaptability and flexibility of these narratives in shaping a prison social imaginary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modern Italian Studies
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571x.2026.2652769
Primary Topic
Early Modern Women Writers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narratives on solitary confinement and Italian ‘primacy’ in transatlantic perspective (eighteenth–nineteenth century)

Chiara Lucrezio Monticelli
Journal of Modern Italian Studies
Early Modern Women Writers
article

Narratives on solitary confinement and Italian ‘primacy’ in transatlantic perspective (eighteenth–nineteenth century)

Chiara Lucrezio Monticelli
article en

Abstract

This article examines the role of the Catholic and Italian legacy in the transnational public debate on prison reform during the first half of the nineteenth century. The hegemony of the Philadelphia model of ‘solitary confinement’ in contemporary discourse has long obscured the connections between this model and the ‘cellular confinement’ experiments of eighteenth-century Italian states, particularly the houses of correction in Milan and Rome.The emergence of a narrative asserting an Italian – later specifically Roman – ‘primacy’ in the origins of penal confinement developed across different punitive contexts and regimes, including Protestant and Catholic European networks as well as American Quakers. The invocation of Italian precedents relied on a range of rhetorical strategies aimed at legitimizing the ‘modern penitentiary’.Focusing on the synchronicity and circulation of texts (essays, travel accounts, and newspaper articles) the article highlights the adaptability and flexibility of these narratives in shaping a prison social imaginary.

Journal of Modern Italian Studies
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
European Commission
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Early Modern Women Writers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.