Understanding participants’ experiences of a behaviour change intervention within cardiac rehabilitation: A nested process evaluation within the STRENGTH randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The STRENGTH (Self-management and Theory-based Rehabilitation Encouraging New Gateways to Healthy-Hearts) study evaluated a behaviour change intervention embedded within cardiac rehabilitation for individuals with coronary heart disease. This manuscript reports the process evaluation, which aimed to explore participants' experiences of physical activity, barriers and facilitators to maintaining physical activity, and contextual and process-related factors influencing engagement with the intervention. METHODS: A process evaluation was nested within a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from both intervention and control groups, focus groups were conducted with intervention participants. Thematic analysis examined factors influencing physical activity maintenance, including context, implementation, mechanisms of impact and perceived outcomes. Quantitative procedures measured intervention fidelity through attendance records and participant diaries. RESULTS: Both groups highlighted environmental, social, and personal factors influencing participation in cardiac rehabilitation, such as social support, professional oversight, and structured programming. Trainers and peer interactions were valued for motivation and perceived safety. The intervention group reported additional facilitators, including tailored support, external accountability, and self-monitoring, which increased awareness and reinforced adherence. Mechanisms of impact included increased awareness of physical activity, greater exercise confidence, and a sense of accomplishment. A perceived lack of exercise confidence may have hindered independent physical activity engagement. CONCLUSIONS: While behaviour change strategies can enhance engagement in cardiac rehabilitation, their impact on measurable health outcomes remains unclear. Social support, professional oversight, and structured programming appear effective in maintaining physical activity levels, but future interventions should prioritise exercise confidence and education to promote sustained behaviour change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 26-01-2023 (ID: NCT05705310).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351117
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding participants’ experiences of a behaviour change intervention within cardiac rehabilitation: A nested process evaluation within the STRENGTH randomised controlled trial

Rachel O’Reilly, Jason J. Wilson, Mark A. Tully, Nicole E. Blackburn et al.
PLoS ONE
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Understanding participants’ experiences of a behaviour change intervention within cardiac rehabilitation: A nested process evaluation within the STRENGTH randomised controlled trial

Rachel O’Reilly, Jason J. Wilson, Mark A. Tully, Nicole E. Blackburn, Clare T. M. Doherty, Kim Kensett, Lisa Spratt, Victoria Irving
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The STRENGTH (Self-management and Theory-based Rehabilitation Encouraging New Gateways to Healthy-Hearts) study evaluated a behaviour change intervention embedded within cardiac rehabilitation for individuals with coronary heart disease. This manuscript reports the process evaluation, which aimed to explore participants' experiences of physical activity, barriers and facilitators to maintaining physical activity, and contextual and process-related factors influencing engagement with the intervention. METHODS: A process evaluation was nested within a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from both intervention and control groups, focus groups were conducted with intervention participants. Thematic analysis examined factors influencing physical activity maintenance, including context, implementation, mechanisms of impact and perceived outcomes. Quantitative procedures measured intervention fidelity through attendance records and participant diaries. RESULTS: Both groups highlighted environmental, social, and personal factors influencing participation in cardiac rehabilitation, such as social support, professional oversight, and structured programming. Trainers and peer interactions were valued for motivation and perceived safety. The intervention group reported additional facilitators, including tailored support, external accountability, and self-monitoring, which increased awareness and reinforced adherence. Mechanisms of impact included increased awareness of physical activity, greater exercise confidence, and a sense of accomplishment. A perceived lack of exercise confidence may have hindered independent physical activity engagement. CONCLUSIONS: While behaviour change strategies can enhance engagement in cardiac rehabilitation, their impact on measurable health outcomes remains unclear. Social support, professional oversight, and structured programming appear effective in maintaining physical activity levels, but future interventions should prioritise exercise confidence and education to promote sustained behaviour change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 26-01-2023 (ID: NCT05705310).

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB), University of Ulster (GB), Derry City Council (GB), Belfast City Council (GB), Public Health Agency (GB), South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
Heart Research UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.