Are We Machine or Are We Author? Rethinking Authorship and Its Ties to Copyright Amid Artificial Intelligence Creativity

ABSTRACT With the development of generative Artificial Intelligence, the question of the nature of authorship in the copyright system has returned. Disillusioned with traditional answers based on the concept of copyright, we turn the tables and consider why we ask about authorship in the first place. In the following paper, we show that the real problem of machine creativity concerning copyright law is of epistemic origin (the attribution problem), why neither granting nor not granting copyright would solve this problem, and why it has actually been replaced within the academic discourse by a pseudo‐problem. Finally, we propose an outline of a solution that goes beyond the scope of the current dispute: to reject the dogma that the author is inseparable from the copyright; to attribute works for epistemic, not only economic reasons; to (re)define machine authorship in copyright law through duties; and—going forward—to reconsider the role of the author as a legal concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70176
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are We Machine or Are We Author? Rethinking Authorship and Its Ties to Copyright Amid Artificial Intelligence Creativity

Bartosz Brożek, Bartłomiej Kucharzyk, Ewa Laskowska-Litak
Regulation & Governance
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Are We Machine or Are We Author? Rethinking Authorship and Its Ties to Copyright Amid Artificial Intelligence Creativity

Bartosz Brożek, Bartłomiej Kucharzyk, Ewa Laskowska-Litak
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the development of generative Artificial Intelligence, the question of the nature of authorship in the copyright system has returned. Disillusioned with traditional answers based on the concept of copyright, we turn the tables and consider why we ask about authorship in the first place. In the following paper, we show that the real problem of machine creativity concerning copyright law is of epistemic origin (the attribution problem), why neither granting nor not granting copyright would solve this problem, and why it has actually been replaced within the academic discourse by a pseudo‐problem. Finally, we propose an outline of a solution that goes beyond the scope of the current dispute: to reject the dogma that the author is inseparable from the copyright; to attribute works for epistemic, not only economic reasons; to (re)define machine authorship in copyright law through duties; and—going forward—to reconsider the role of the author as a legal concept.

Regulation & Governance
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.