Guard your mind: Mind manipulation detection via multi-agent interaction and fine-grained stepwise reasoning

Mind manipulation in dialogue exploits emotional vulnerabilities via covert tactics and hidden goals. We present a fine-grained framework that (i) detects turn-level manipulation tactics and (ii) infers dialogue-level intent before issuing a final manipulation judgment. To support training and evaluation, we curate a balanced dataset of 776 dialogues (388 manipulative, 388 non-manipulative; 15520 dialogue turns) generated via a three-phase multi-agent simulation with dual verification. On this benchmark, our model achieves 84.01% accuracy for dialogue-level manipulation detection, outperforming the strongest baseline by +6.83%. It further attains 76.25% accuracy on tactic detection and 79.53% BERTScore for intent prediction. A user study on forward-simulatability shows +11.0% accuracy improvement when the tactics and intent detected by our model are provided as rationale for dialogue manipulation detection results. These results indicate that explicit, stepwise reasoning over tactics and intent yields both higher performance and actionable interpretability for proactive monitoring of manipulative conversations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Information Processing & Management
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2026.104970
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guard your mind: Mind manipulation detection via multi-agent interaction and fine-grained stepwise reasoning

Ningyun Li, Yang Ding, Yi Dai, Kaisheng Zeng
Information Processing & Management
Topic Modeling
article

Guard your mind: Mind manipulation detection via multi-agent interaction and fine-grained stepwise reasoning

Ningyun Li, Yang Ding, Yi Dai, Kaisheng Zeng
article en

Abstract

Mind manipulation in dialogue exploits emotional vulnerabilities via covert tactics and hidden goals. We present a fine-grained framework that (i) detects turn-level manipulation tactics and (ii) infers dialogue-level intent before issuing a final manipulation judgment. To support training and evaluation, we curate a balanced dataset of 776 dialogues (388 manipulative, 388 non-manipulative; 15520 dialogue turns) generated via a three-phase multi-agent simulation with dual verification. On this benchmark, our model achieves 84.01% accuracy for dialogue-level manipulation detection, outperforming the strongest baseline by +6.83%. It further attains 76.25% accuracy on tactic detection and 79.53% BERTScore for intent prediction. A user study on forward-simulatability shows +11.0% accuracy improvement when the tactics and intent detected by our model are provided as rationale for dialogue manipulation detection results. These results indicate that explicit, stepwise reasoning over tactics and intent yields both higher performance and actionable interpretability for proactive monitoring of manipulative conversations.

Information Processing & ManagementVol. 64(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.