From Minimums to Maximums: Evaluating the Impact of Raleigh’s Parking Reform on Residential Parking Supply

This study evaluates the effects of parking reform in Raleigh, where minimum parking requirements were removed in select districts in 2020 and citywide in 2022 — alongside the introduction of parking maximums. Using publicly available Administrative Site Review documents, we construct a dataset of residential developments approved between 2018 and 2025 and conduct a comparative analysis of parking provision across differing regulatory regimes. We find that the average number of parking spaces provided across developments approved after the removal of minimum parking requirements was 27% lower than the average provided across developments approved under minimum requirements. Following the citywide removal of minimums, 67% of developments supplied less parking than previously permitted, indicating that earlier regulations induced excess parking provision. Additionally, 22% of developments approved prior to the adoption of parking maximums would exceed the limits later imposed. These findings show that Raleigh's previous parking requirements forced developers to build more parking than the market demanded, and that recent reforms have meaningfully reduced supply.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/8bfm-k835
Primary Topic
Smart Parking Systems Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Minimums to Maximums: Evaluating the Impact of Raleigh’s Parking Reform on Residential Parking Supply

Logan Bealke
UNC Libraries
Smart Parking Systems Research
article

From Minimums to Maximums: Evaluating the Impact of Raleigh’s Parking Reform on Residential Parking Supply

Logan Bealke
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of parking reform in Raleigh, where minimum parking requirements were removed in select districts in 2020 and citywide in 2022 — alongside the introduction of parking maximums. Using publicly available Administrative Site Review documents, we construct a dataset of residential developments approved between 2018 and 2025 and conduct a comparative analysis of parking provision across differing regulatory regimes. We find that the average number of parking spaces provided across developments approved after the removal of minimum parking requirements was 27% lower than the average provided across developments approved under minimum requirements. Following the citywide removal of minimums, 67% of developments supplied less parking than previously permitted, indicating that earlier regulations induced excess parking provision. Additionally, 22% of developments approved prior to the adoption of parking maximums would exceed the limits later imposed. These findings show that Raleigh's previous parking requirements forced developers to build more parking than the market demanded, and that recent reforms have meaningfully reduced supply.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Smart Parking Systems Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.