Product regulation in co-pyrolysis of multi-source wastes and analysis of environmental and economic potential

With the continuous increase in global solid waste generation, conventional disposal technologies have increasingly shown limitations in environmental performance, resource utilization, and economic efficiency. In this study, the co-pyrolysis of four representative multi-source wastes, namely medical protective clothing (MPC), agricultural plastic film mainly composed of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), municipal sludge (SS), and municipal solid waste (MSW), was investigated. An Aspen Plus-based comparative model was established to examine eight co-pyrolysis scenarios, with emphasis on the effects of temperature and blending-ratio redistribution on product distribution and major pollutant output. At 500 °C, increasing the total fraction of SS and MSW from 20.0 to 80.0 wt% increased the yields of pyrolysis gas and pyrolysis oil by 6.5 wt% and 5.1 wt%, respectively, while the yield of char decreased by 11.6 wt%. Among the evaluated co-pyrolysis pathways, the condition with MPC: LDPE: SS: MSW = 40:40:10:10 showed the lowest CO₂ emission of 425.01 kg and the lowest SO₂ emission of 2.0 kg during the production of 1 t of char, and it also exhibited favorable combined environmental and economic performance within the present comparative framework. Under the adopted screening-level economic assumptions, the cumulative cash flow of this pathway became positive from the fourth quarter. In addition, a conceptual waste-pyrolysis/coal-fired-boiler coupling route was outlined as a possible downstream application scenario. Overall, this study clarified product-regulation behavior in multi-source waste co-pyrolysis and provided process-level support for comparative pathway screening under a unified modelling framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2026.2688339
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Product regulation in co-pyrolysis of multi-source wastes and analysis of environmental and economic potential

Shuguang Ti, Shanshan Deng, H Liu, Wenwen Chang et al.
Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Product regulation in co-pyrolysis of multi-source wastes and analysis of environmental and economic potential

Shuguang Ti, Shanshan Deng, H Liu, Wenwen Chang, Songzhen Tang, Haopeng Wang, Yalei Kang
article en

Abstract

With the continuous increase in global solid waste generation, conventional disposal technologies have increasingly shown limitations in environmental performance, resource utilization, and economic efficiency. In this study, the co-pyrolysis of four representative multi-source wastes, namely medical protective clothing (MPC), agricultural plastic film mainly composed of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), municipal sludge (SS), and municipal solid waste (MSW), was investigated. An Aspen Plus-based comparative model was established to examine eight co-pyrolysis scenarios, with emphasis on the effects of temperature and blending-ratio redistribution on product distribution and major pollutant output. At 500 °C, increasing the total fraction of SS and MSW from 20.0 to 80.0 wt% increased the yields of pyrolysis gas and pyrolysis oil by 6.5 wt% and 5.1 wt%, respectively, while the yield of char decreased by 11.6 wt%. Among the evaluated co-pyrolysis pathways, the condition with MPC: LDPE: SS: MSW = 40:40:10:10 showed the lowest CO₂ emission of 425.01 kg and the lowest SO₂ emission of 2.0 kg during the production of 1 t of char, and it also exhibited favorable combined environmental and economic performance within the present comparative framework. Under the adopted screening-level economic assumptions, the cumulative cash flow of this pathway became positive from the fourth quarter. In addition, a conceptual waste-pyrolysis/coal-fired-boiler coupling route was outlined as a possible downstream application scenario. Overall, this study clarified product-regulation behavior in multi-source waste co-pyrolysis and provided process-level support for comparative pathway screening under a unified modelling framework.

Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental EffectsVol. 48(1)
China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (China) (CN), Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.